Cited by 258Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatmentMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Biofeedback/relaxation training and exercise interventions for fibromyalgia: A prospective trial

Buckelew, Susan P., Conway, Robert, Parker, Jerry, Deuser, William E., Read, Joan, Witty, Thomas E., Hewett, John E., Minor, Marian +5 more·1998·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of biofeedback/relaxation, exercise, and a combined program for the treatment of fibromyalgia. METHODS: Subjects (n = 119) were randomly assigned to one of 4 groups: 1) biofeedback/relaxation training, 2) exercise training, 3) a combination treatment, or 4) an educational/attention control program. RESULTS: All 3 treatment groups produced improvements in self-efficacy for function relative to the control condition. In addition, all treatment groups were significantly different from the control group on tender point index scores, reflecting a modest deterioration by the attention control group rather than improvements by the treatment groups. The exercise and combination groups also resulted in modest improvements on a physical activity measure. The combination group best maintained benefits across the 2-year period. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that these 3 treatment interventions result in improved self-efficacy for physical function which was best maintained by the combination group.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.1790110307

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buckelew, S. P., Conway, R., Parker, J., Deuser, W. E., Read, J., Witty, T. E., Hewett, J. E., Minor, M., Johnson, J. C., Van Male, L., McIntosh, M. J., Nigh, M., & Kay, D. R.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Buckelew, Susan P.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-06
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
196-209
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2066006979
Cited by
258
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 16
FWCI
7.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Arthritis & Rheumatism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r29ar039481-04)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (1-R29-AR39481)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
fibromyalgia, biofeedback, relaxation training, exercise training, combination therapy, self-efficacy, physical function, physical activity, maintenance therapy, attentional control
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Biofeedback, Psychology, Combined Modality Therapy, Exercise Therapy, Female, Fibromyalgia, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Prospective Studies, Relaxation Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review