The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers
Abstract
This report describes the results of automatic processing of a large number of scientific papers according to a rigorously defined criterion of coupling. The population of papers under study was ordered into groups that satisfy the stated criterion of interrelation. An examination of the papers that constitute the groups shows a high degree of logical correlation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Kessler M. M.1961.An experimental study of bibliographic coupling between technical papers.M.I.T. Report R‐1 November. (Revised June 1962. To be published in theIRE Transactions PGIT.) · DOI
Cited by
bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007 · Cited by 16,064
How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070 · Cited by 14,329
Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428114562629 · Cited by 7,495
Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents
Small, H. (1973) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/asi.4630240406 · Cited by 5,345
Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting
Perianes-Rodriguez, A., Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2016) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006 · Cited by 1,416
Mariani, M. M., Perez‐Vega, R., & Wirtz, J. (2022) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21619 · Cited by 631
Personalization in personalized marketing: Trends and ways forward
Chandra, S., Verma, S., Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., & Donthu, N. (2022) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21670 · Cited by 595
Circular economy in the building and construction sector: a scientific evolution analysis
Norouzi, M., Chàfer, M., Cabeza, L. F., Jiménez, L., & Boer, D. (2021) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102704 · Cited by 482
Alexa, what do we know about conversational commerce? Insights from a systematic literature review.
Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., Verma, S., & Chaturvedi, R. (2022) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21654 · Cited by 293
Template detection via data mining and its applications
Bar-Yossef, Z., & Rajagopalan, S. (2002) · Proceedings of the 11th international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/511446.511522 · Cited by 271
Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations
Brooks, T. A. (1985) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/asi.4630360402 · Cited by 256
Citation analysis: A social and dynamic approach to knowledge organization
Hjørland, B. (2013) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2013.07.001 · Cited by 244
Social companionship with artificial intelligence: Recent trends and future avenues
Chaturvedi, R., Verma, S., Das, R., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122634 · Cited by 244
Türkeli, S., Kemp, R., Huang, B., Bleischwitz, R., & McDowall, W. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.118 · Cited by 178
Mas-Tur, A., Roig-Tierno, N., Sarin, S., Haon, C., Sego, T., Belkhouja, M., Porter, A., & Merigó, J. M. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120487 · Cited by 147
Virtual Reality Aided Therapy towards Health 4.0: A Two-Decade Bibliometric Analysis
Liu, Z., Ren, L., Xiao, C., Zhang, K., & Demian, P. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19031525 · Cited by 142
Sigala, M., Kumar, S., Donthu, N., Sureka, R., & Joshi, Y. (2021) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.04.005 · Cited by 130
Stopar, K., & Bartol, T. (2019) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2990-5 · Cited by 119
Random thoughts on citationology its theory and practice
Garfield, E. (1998) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/bf02458396 · Cited by 96
Bunjak, A., Černe, M., & Schölly, E. L. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.792599 · Cited by 74
“Bibliometric analysis is not necessarily a new method (Kessler, 1963), but it has gained scholarly interest in the recent past due to easily accessible online databases, which contain nearly all documents that have ever been published.”
BackgroundReference-based search strategies in systematic reviews
Skoglund, M., & Runeson, P. (2009) · Electronic Workshops in Computing · doi:10.14236/ewic/ease2009.4 · Cited by 71
Neighborhood Contrastive Learning for Scientific Document Representations with Citation Embeddings
Ostendorff, M., Rethmeier, N., Augenstein, I., Gipp, B., & Rehm, G. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.802 · Cited by 56
Comparing citation contexts for information retrieval
Ritchie, A., Robertson, S., & Teufel, S. (2008) · Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management · doi:10.1145/1458082.1458113 · Cited by 55
Bornmann, L., Wagner, C., & Leydesdorff, L. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194805 · Cited by 39
Pomerlyan, E., & Belitski, M. (2023) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2023.10.003 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Kessler, M. M.
- Venue
- American Documentation
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1963-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10-25
- ISSN
- 0096-946X (ISSN-L)
- 1936-6108
- OpenAlex
- W1970859146
- Cited by
- 2,855
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
