Cited by 62Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Testing the Predictive Power of Cognitive Atypicalities in Autistic Children: Evidence from a 3‐Year Follow‐Up Study

Pellicano, Elizabeth·2013·Autism Research

Abstract

This follow‐up study investigated the predictive power of early cognitive atypicalities. Specifically, it examined whether early individual differences in specific cognitive skills, including theory of mind, executive function, and central coherence, could uniquely account for variation in autistic children's behaviors—social communication, repetitive behaviors, and interests and insistence on sameness—at follow‐up. Thirty‐seven cognitively able children with an autism spectrum condition were assessed on tests tapping verbal and nonverbal ability, theory of mind (false‐belief prediction), executive function (planning ability, cognitive flexibility, and inhibitory control), and central coherence (local processing) at intake and their behavioral functioning (social communication, repetitive behaviors and interests, insistence on sameness) 3 years later. Individual differences in early executive but not theory of mind skills predicted variation in children's social communication. Individual differences in children's early executive function also predicted the degree of repetitive behaviors and interests at follow‐up. There were no predictive relationships between early central coherence and children's insistence on sameness. These findings challenge the notion that distinct cognitive atypicalities map on to specific behavioral features of autism. Instead, early variation in executive function plays a key role in helping to shape autistic children's emerging behaviors, including their social communication and repetitive behaviors and interests. Autism Res 2013, ●●: ●●–●●. © 2013 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aur.1286

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pellicano, E.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Pellicano, Elizabeth
Venue
Autism Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-03-14
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
258-267
ISSN
  • 1939-3792 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-3806
OpenAlex
W2116534739
Cited by
62
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Autism Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Experimental Psychology Society
  • British Academy
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, children with autism, executive function, theory of mind, central coherence, social communication, repetitive behavior, insistence on sameness, individual differences, cognitive flexibility, inhibitory control, planning skills, local processing
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Cognition Disorders, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Individuality, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Predictive Value of Tests, Task Performance and Analysis, Executive Function, Theory of Mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review