Cited by 50Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlAction Observation and Synchronization

Children with autism show altered autonomic adaptation to novel and familiar social partners

Neuhaus, Emily, Bernier, Raphael A., Beauchaine, Theodore P.·2016·Autism Research

Abstract

Social deficits are fundamental to autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and a growing body of research implicates altered functioning of the autonomic nervous system (ANS), including both sympathetic and parasympathetic branches. However, few studies have explored both branches concurrently in ASD, particularly within the context of social interaction. The current study investigates patterns of change in indices of sympathetic (pre-ejection period; PEP) and parasympathetic (respiratory sinus arrhythmia; RSA) cardiac influence as boys (ages 8-11 years) with (N = 18) and without (N = 18) ASD engage in dyadic social interaction with novel and familiar social partners. Groups showed similar patterns of autonomic change during interaction with the novel partner, but differed in heart rate, PEP, and RSA reactivity while interacting with a familiar partner. Boys without ASD evinced decreasing sympathetic and increasing parasympathetic influence, whereas boys with ASD increased in sympathetic influence. Boys without ASD also demonstrated more consistent ANS responses across partners than those with ASD, with parasympathetic responding differentiating familiar and novel interaction partners. Finally, PEP slopes with a familiar partner correlated with boys' social skills. Implications include the importance of considering autonomic state during clinical assessment and treatment, and the potential value of regulation strategies as a complement to intervention programs aiming to support social cognition and behavior. Autism Res 2016, 9: 579-591. © 2015 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aur.1543

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neuhaus, E., Bernier, R. A., & Beauchaine, T. P.
Affiliations
  • Seattle Children's Research Institute (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Neuhaus, Emily
Venue
Autism Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-08-25
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
579-591
ISSN
  • 1939-3792 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-3806
OpenAlex
W1557710221
Cited by
50
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Autism Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Autism Speaks
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, autonomic nervous system, sympathetic nervous system, parasympathetic nervous system, pre-ejection period, respiratory sinus arrhythmia, heart rate reactivity, social interaction, dyadic interaction, social skills, children
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adaptation, Physiological, Arrhythmia, Sinus, Autonomic Nervous System, Child, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Social Behavior, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review