CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 6Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies

Strategic social decision making undergoes significant changes in typically developing and autistic early adolescents

Open access
Liu, Wenda, Shah, Nikita, Ma, Ili, Rosenblau, Gabriela·2024·Developmental Science
DOI 10.1111/desc.13463
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Information sampling about others’ trustworthiness prior to cooperation allows humans to minimize the risk of exploitation. Here, we examined whether early adolescence or preadolescence, a stage defined as in between childhood and adolescence, is a significant developmental period for strategic social decisions. We also sought to characterize differences between autistic children and their typically developing (TD) peers. TD (N = 48) and autistic (N = 56) 8‐ to 12‐year‐olds played an online information sampling trust game. While both groups adapted their information sampling and cooperation to the various trustworthiness levels of the trustees, groups differed in how age and social skills modulated task behavior. In the TD group social skills were a stronger overall predictor of task behavior. In the autistic group, age was a stronger predictor and interacted with social skills. Computational modeling revealed that both groups used the same heuristic information sampling strategy—albeit older TD children were more efficient as reflected by decreasing decision noise with age. Autistic children had lower prior beliefs about the trustee's trustworthiness compared to TD children. These lower priors indicate that children believed the trustees to be less trustworthy. Lower priors scaled with lower social skills across groups. Notably, groups did not differ in prior uncertainty, meaning that the priors of TD and autistic children were equally strong. Taken together, we found significant development in information sampling and cooperation in early adolescence and nuanced differences between TD and autistic children. Our study highlights the importance of deep phenotyping of children including clinical measures, behavioral experiments and computational modeling. Research Highlights: We specified how early adolescents with and without an autism diagnosis sampled information about their interaction partners and made cooperation decisions in a strategic game. Early adolescence is a significant developmental period for strategic decision making, marked by significant changes in information sampling efficiency and adaptivity to the partner's behavior. Autistic and non‐autistic groups differed in how age and social skills modulated task behavior; in non‐autistic children behavior was more indicative of overall social skills. Computational modeling revealed differences between autistic and non‐autistic groups in their initial beliefs about cooperation partners; autistic children expected their partners to be less trustworthy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/desc.13463

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Liu et al. found that autistic and non-autistic adolescents showed comparable prior uncertainty in a social trust game, even though their prior beliefs about a partner's trustworthiness differed.

    “Similarly, Liu et al.[55] found that autistic and non-autistic adolescents showed comparable prior uncertainty in a social trust game, even though their prior beliefs about a partner’s trustworthiness differed.”

    From Predicting emotional valence in autism: a preregistered study in the Bayesian Brain framework (2026) · cites this paper as [55]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Liu, W., Shah, N., Ma, I., & Rosenblau, G.
Affiliations
  • Children's National (US)
  • Leiden University (NL)
Corresponding author
  • Liu, Wenda
  • Rosenblau, Gabriela
ORCID
Venue
Developmental Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-12-21
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
e13463-e13463
ISSN
  • 1363-755X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7687
DOI
10.1111/desc.13463
OpenAlex
W4390110982
Cited by
6
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Developmental Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, information sampling, trustworthiness, cooperation, early adolescence, late childhood, social skills, prior beliefs, prior uncertainty, decision noise, computational modeling, trust game, exploitation risk
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adolescent, Autistic Disorder, Child, Humans, Peer Group, Uncertainty, Trust, Social Skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review