Cited by 131CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsAnimal Genetics and Reproduction

One-step generation of triple knockout CHO cell lines using CRISPR/Cas9 and fluorescent enrichment

Grav, Lise Marie, Lee, Jae Seong, Gerling, Signe, Kallehauge, Thomas Beuchert, Hansen, Anders Holmgaard, Kol, Stefan, Lee, Gyun Min, Pedersen, Lasse Ebdrup +1 more·2015·Biotechnology Journal

Abstract

The CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing technology has previously been shown to be a highly efficient tool for generating gene disruptions in CHO cells. In this study we further demonstrate the applicability and efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing by disrupting FUT8, BAK and BAX simultaneously in a multiplexing setup in CHO cells. To isolate Cas9‐expressing cells from transfected cell pools, GFP was linked to the Cas9 nuclease via a 2A peptide. With this method, the average indel frequencies generated at the three genomic loci were increased from 11% before enrichment to 68% after enrichment. Despite the high number of genome editing events in the enriched cell pools, no significant off‐target effects were observed from off‐target prediction followed by deep sequencing. Single cell sorting of enriched multiplexed cells and deep sequencing of 97 clones revealed the presence of four single, 23 double and 34 triple gene‐disrupted cell lines. Further characterization of selected potential triple knockout clones confirmed the removal of Bak and Bax protein and disrupted fucosylation activity as expected. The knockout cell lines showed improved resistance to apoptosis compared to wild‐type CHO‐S cells. Taken together, multiplexing with CRISPR/Cas9 can accelerate genome engineering efforts in CHO cells even further.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/biot.201500027

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CHO cells where simultaneous disruption of FUT8, BAX and BAK gene by CRISPR/Cas9 was achieved and confirmed by deep sequencing showed increased resistance to apoptosis.

    “As an example, CHO cells, where simultaneous disruption of FUT8, BAX and BAK gene by CRISP/Cas9 was achieved and confirmed by deep sequencing, showed increased resistance to apoptosis (Grav et al., 2015).”

    From Therapeutic glycoprotein production in mammalian cells (2017) · cites this paper as Grav et al., 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grav, L. M., Lee, J. S., Gerling, S., Kallehauge, T. B., Hansen, A. H., Kol, S., Lee, G. M., Pedersen, L. E., & Kildegaard, H. F.
Affiliations
  • Novo Nordisk Foundation (DK)
  • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
Corresponding author
Kildegaard, Helene Faustrup
Venue
Biotechnology Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-30
Volume
10
Issue
9
Pages
1446-1456
ISSN
  • 1860-6768 (ISSN-L)
  • 1860-7314
OpenAlex
W2069942860
Cited by
131
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biotechnology Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion)
Funders
The Novo Nordisk Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
Keywords
CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, CHO cells, multiplex genome editing, 2A peptide, FUT8, Bak, Bax, apoptosis resistance, fucosylation, off-target effects, single-cell sorting
MeSH terms
Animals, Biotechnology, Cell Survival, Cricetulus, Flow Cytometry, Cricetinae, CHO Cells, Apoptosis, RNA Editing, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Gene Knockout Techniques, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review