Cited by 20Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

Retrieval practice facilitates learning by strengthening processing in both the anterior and posterior hippocampus.

Open access
Wiklund‐Hörnqvist, Carola, Stillesjö, Sara, Andersson, Micael, Jonsson, Bert, Nyberg, Lars·2021·Brain and Behavior

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND METHODS: A large number of behavioral studies show that retrieval practice is a powerful way of strengthening learning of new information. Repeated retrieval might support long-term retention in a quantitative sense by inducing stronger episodic representations or in a qualitative sense by contributing to the formation of more gist-like representations. Here we used fMRI to examine the brain bases related to the learning effects following retrieval practice and provide imaging support for both views by showing increased activation of anterior and posterior hippocampus regions during a delayed memory test. RESULTS: Brain activity in the posterior hippocampus increased linearly as a function of number of successful retrievals during initial learning, whereas anterior hippocampus activity was restricted to items retrieved many but not few times during the learning phase. CONCLUSION: Taken together, these findings indicate that retrieval practice strengthens subsequent retention via "dual action" in the anterior and posterior hippocampus, possibly reflecting coding of individual experiences as well as integration and generalization across multiple experiences. Our findings are of educational significance by providing insight into the brain bases of a learning method of applied relevance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/brb3.1909

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Retrieval practice increases hippocampal activity related to detailed and generalized memory representations one week after learning.

    “Retrieval practice has also been found to increase hippocampal activity related to detailed and generalized memory representations 1 week after learning (Wiklund-Hörnqvist et al., 2020).”

    From Retrieval Practice Is Effective Regardless of Self-Reported Need for Cognition - Behavioral and Brain Imaging Evidence (2022) · cites this paper as Wiklund-Hörnqvist et al., 2020

    The Abstract (Introduction and Methods) reports increased anterior and posterior hippocampal activation during a delayed memory test, and the Discussion describes successful recall of information learned one week earlier. But the Discussion calls the link between those hippocampal responses and detailed or gist-like representations speculative; the citing sentence presents that interpretation without the qualification. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Retrieval practice strengthens subsequent memory via a dual action of the hippocampus to support retrieval of detailed as well as generalized memory representations.

    “In addition, it was recently suggested that retrieval practice strengthens subsequent memory via a dual action of the hippocampus to support retrieval of detailed as well as generalized memory representations (Wiklund-Hörnqvist et al., 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiklund‐Hörnqvist, C., Stillesjö, S., Andersson, M., Jonsson, B., & Nyberg, L.
Affiliations
Umeå University (SE)
Corresponding author
Wiklund‐Hörnqvist, Carola
Venue
Brain and Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-10-22
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
e01909-e01909
ISSN
  • 2157-9032 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-3279
OpenAlex
W3093562240
Cited by
20
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain and Behavior (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Vetenskapsrådet (2014-2099., 2016-07213)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
retrieval practice, hippocampus, anterior hippocampus, posterior hippocampus, memory consolidation, long-term retention, episodic memory, delayed recall
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Hippocampus, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Mental Recall, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review