Cited by 68BRCA gene mutations in cancerPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchGenetic factors in colorectal cancer

BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations are frequently demonstrated in both high‐risk pancreatic cancer screening and pancreatic cancer cohorts

Open access
Lucas, Aimee L., Frado, Laura E., Hwang, Caroline, Kumar, Sheila, Khanna, Lauren G., Levinson, Elana J., Chabot, John A., Chung, Wendy K. +1 more·2014·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately 10% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is due to a genetic predisposition, including the breast and ovarian cancer syndrome germline mutations BRCA1 and BRCA2. Knowledge of specific genetic mutations predisposing to PDAC may enable risk stratification, early detection, and the development of effective screening and surveillance programs. In the current study, the authors attempted to determine the diagnostic yield of testing for BRCA1/2 germline mutations in a PDAC screening cohort and a PDAC cohort referred for genetic testing. METHODS: Patients in a high‐risk PDAC prevention and genetics program or those with a personal history of PDAC who were referred for genetic evaluation underwent testing for BRCA1/2 germline mutations. Clinical BRCA1/2 genetic testing included testing for the 3 Ashkenazi Jewish founder mutations or BRCA1/2 comprehensive testing. RESULTS: A total of 37 patients without PDAC underwent BRCA1/2 testing at the study institution. Genetic testing identified 7 patients who were BRCA1/2 carriers for a yield of 18.9%. Six patients carried Ashkenazi Jewish founder mutations (3 with BRCA1 and 3 with BRCA2), and 1 patient was found to have a BRCA2 mutation on comprehensive testing. Thirty‐two patients with PDAC underwent BRCA1/2 genetic testing. Five patients had Ashkenazi Jewish founder mutations (2 with BRCA1 and 3 with BRCA2), and 2 patients were found to have BRCA2 mutations on comprehensive testing. The diagnostic yield was 7 of 32 patients (21.9%). CONCLUSIONS: BRCA1/2 testing is useful in PDAC risk stratification and alters risk assignment and screening recommendations for mutation‐positive patients and their families. Clinical BRCA1/2 testing should be considered in patients of Ashkenazi Jewish descent with a personal history or family history of PDAC, even in the absence of a family history of breast and ovarian cancer. Cancer 2014;120:1960–1967. © 2014 American Cancer Society.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.28662

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]Klein AP Hruban RH Brune KA Familial pancreatic cancer Cancer J 2001 7 266 73 11561603
  2. [3]Lowenfels AB Maisonneuve P DiMagno EP Hereditary pancreatitis and the risk of pancreatic cancer. International Hereditary Pancreatitis Study Group J Natl Cancer Inst 1997 89 442 6 9091646

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lucas, A. L., Frado, L. E., Hwang, C., Kumar, S., Khanna, L. G., Levinson, E. J., Chabot, J. A., Chung, W. K., & Frucht, H.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Lucas, Aimee L.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-04-15
Volume
120
Issue
13
Pages
1960-1967
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W1488988442
Cited by
68
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T32 DK083256)
  • Hirshberg Foundation for Pancreatic Cancer Research
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1 TR000040)
  • American College of Gastroenterology (ACG-CR-070-2012)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Keywords
BRCA1, BRCA2, germline mutations, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, pancreatic cancer screening, genetic susceptibility, diagnostic yield, risk stratification, hereditary cancer
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Genetic Testing, Humans, Jews, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Germ-Line Mutation, Risk Assessment, Founder Effect, BRCA1 Protein, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal, BRCA2 Protein, Early Detection of Cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review