The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distinct behaviors of neural stem and progenitor cells underlie cortical neurogenesis
Open accessAbstract
Neocortical precursor cells undergo symmetric and asymmetric divisions while producing large numbers of diverse cortical cell types. In Drosophila, cleavage plane orientation dictates the inheritance of fate‐determinants and the symmetry of newborn daughter cells during neuroblast cell divisions. One model for predicting daughter cell fate in the mammalian neocortex is also based on cleavage plane orientation. Precursor cell divisions with a cleavage plane orientation that is perpendicular with respect to the ventricular surface (vertical) are predicted to be symmetric, while divisions with a cleavage plane orientation that is parallel to the surface (horizontal) are predicted to be asymmetric neurogenic divisions. However, analysis of cleavage plane orientation at the ventricle suggests that the number of predicted neurogenic divisions might be insufficient to produce large amounts of cortical neurons. To understand factors that correlate with the symmetry of cell divisions, we examined rat neocortical precursor cells in situ through real‐time imaging, marker analysis, and electrophysiological recordings. We find that cleavage plane orientation is more closely associated with precursor cell type than with daughter cell fate, as commonly thought. Radial glia cells in the VZ primarily divide with a vertical orientation throughout cortical development and undergo symmetric or asymmetric self‐renewing divisions depending on the stage of development. In contrast, most intermediate progenitor cells divide in the subventricular zone with a horizontal orientation and produce symmetric daughter cells. We propose a model for predicting daughter cell fate that considers precursor cell type, stage of development, and the planar segregation of fate determinants. J. Comp. Neurol. 508:28–44, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Noctor, S. C., Martínez-Cerdeño, V., Ivic, L., & Kriegstein, A. R. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1172 · Cited by 2,229
Self-citationNeurons derived from radial glial cells establish radial units in neocortex
Noctor, S. C., Flint, A. C., Weissman, T. A., Dammerman, R. S., & Kriegstein, A. R. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35055553 · Cited by 2,016
Self-citationVascular niche for adult hippocampal neurogenesis
Palmer, T. D., Willhoite, A. R., & Gage, F. H. (2000) · The Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/1096-9861(20001002)425:4<479::aid-cne2>3.0.co;2-3 · Cited by 1,838
Endothelial Cells Stimulate Self-Renewal and Expand Neurogenesis of Neural Stem Cells
Shen, Q., Goderie, S. K., Jin, L., Karanth, N., Sun, Y., Abramova, N., Vincent, P., Pumiglia, K., & Temple, S. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1095505 · Cited by 1,542
Transient expression of doublecortin during adult neurogenesis
Brown, J. P., Couillard‐Després, S., Cooper‐Kuhn, C. M., Winkler, J., Aigner, L., & Kuhn, H. G. (2003) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.10874 · Cited by 1,496
Regulation of Cerebral Cortical Size by Control of Cell Cycle Exit in Neural Precursors
Chenn, A., & Walsh, C. A. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1074192 · Cited by 1,431
Milestones of neuronal development in the adult hippocampus
Kempermann, G., Jessberger, S., Steiner, B., & Kronenberg, G. (2004) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2004.05.013 · Cited by 1,423
Burns, J. C., Friedmann, T., Driever, W., Burrascano, M., & Yee, J. K. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.17.8033 · Cited by 1,399
Alvarez-Buylla, A., & Lim, D. A. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(04)00111-4 · Cited by 1,318
Englund, C., Fink, A., Lau, C., Pham, D., Daza, R. A. M., Bulfone, A., Kowalczyk, T., & Hevner, R. F. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2899-04.2005 · Cited by 1,261
Cited by
The Glial Nature of Embryonic and Adult Neural Stem Cells
Kriegstein, A., & Alvarez-Buylla, A. (2009) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135600 · Cited by 2,475
Self-citationDevelopment and Evolution of the Human Neocortex
Lui, J. H., Hansen, D. V., & Kriegstein, A. R. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.030 · Cited by 1,342
Self-citationMicroglia Regulate the Number of Neural Precursor Cells in the Developing Cerebral Cortex
Cunningham, C. L., Martínez-Cerdeño, V., & Noctor, S. C. (2013) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3441-12.2013 · Cited by 976
Self-citationOSVZ progenitors of human and ferret neocortex are epithelial-like and expand by integrin signaling
Fietz, S. A., Kelava, I., Vogt, J., Wilsch-Bräuninger, M., Stenzel, D., Fish, J. L., Corbeil, D., Riehn, A., Distler, W., Nitsch, R., et al. (2010) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2553 · Cited by 830
Neural progenitors, neurogenesis and the evolution of the neocortex
Florio, M., & Huttner, W. B. (2014) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.090571 · Cited by 639
Metadata
- Authors
- Noctor, S. C., Martínez‐Cerdeño, V., & Kriegstein, A. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-02-20
- Volume
- 508
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 28-44
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2129016496
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 82
- FWCI
- 9.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distinct behaviors of neural stem and progenitor cells underlie cortical neurogenesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.21669
- The paper
- Noctor, S. C., Martínez‐Cerdeño, V., & Kriegstein, A. R. (2008). Distinct behaviors of neural stem and progenitor cells underlie cortical neurogenesis. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.21669
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.