Cited by 634COVID-19 and Mental HealthMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumResilience and Mental Health

Resilience, COVID-19-related stress, anxiety and depression during the pandemic in a large population enriched for healthcare providers

Open access
Barzilay, Ran, Moore, Tyler M., Greenberg, David M., DiDomenico, Grace E., Brown, Lily A., White, Lauren K., Gur, Ruben C., Gur, Raquel E.·2020·Translational Psychiatry

Abstract

Abstract COVID-19 pandemic is a global calamity posing an unprecedented opportunity to study resilience. We developed a brief resilience survey probing self-reliance, emotion-regulation, interpersonal-relationship patterns and neighborhood-environment, and applied it online during the acute COVID-19 outbreak (April 6–15, 2020), on a crowdsourcing research website ( www.covid19resilience.org ) advertised through social media. We evaluated level of stress (worries) regarding COVID-19: (1) contracting, (2) dying from, (3) currently having, (4) family member contracting, (5) unknowingly infecting others with (6) experiencing significant financial burden following. Anxiety (GAD7) and depression (PHQ2) were measured. Totally, 3042 participants (n = 1964 females, age range 18–79, mean age = 39) completed the resilience and COVID-19-related stress survey and 1350 of them (mean age = 41, SD = 13; n = 997 females) completed GAD7 and PHQ2. Participants significantly endorsed more distress about family contracting COVID-19 (48.5%) and unknowingly infecting others (36%), than getting COVID-19 themselves (19.9%), p < 0.0005 covarying for demographics and proxy COVID-19 exposures like getting tested and knowing infected individuals. Patterns of COVID-19 related worries, rates of anxiety (GAD7 > 10, 22.2%) and depression (PHQ2 > 2, 16.1%) did not differ between healthcare providers and non-healthcare providers. Higher resilience scores were associated with lower COVID-19 related worries (main effect F1,3054 = 134.9; p < 0.00001, covarying for confounders). Increase in 1 SD on resilience score was associated with reduced rate of anxiety (65%) and depression (69%), across healthcare and non-healthcare professionals. Findings provide empirical evidence on mental health associated with COVID-19 outbreak in a large convenience sample, setting a stage for longitudinal studies evaluating mental health trajectories following COVID-19 pandemic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41398-020-00982-4

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stressful events are inherently highly emotional and can increase vulnerability to psychopathology; the ability to regulate emotions may be a critically important factor in determining stress resilience and mental wellbeing.

    “As stressful events are inherently highly emotional (Southwick et al., 2011) and can increase vulnerability to psychopathology (Grueschow et al., 2021), the ability to regulate emotions may be a critically important factor in determining stress resilience (Barzilay et al., 2020; Kaldewaij et al., 2021) and mental wellbeing (Satchit et al., 2011; Silton et al., 2020).”

    From Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Increases Mental Wellbeing and Emotion Regulation During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Synchronous Online Intervention Study (2021) · cites this paper as Barzilay et al., 2020

    The Resilience survey section (page not available) includes emotion regulation among five components of the resilience score. The Results section (page not available) links the composite score to fewer COVID-19 worries, but does not test whether emotion regulation itself determines stress resilience or establish a causal role. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Trait optimism and trait resilience may serve as buffers against the effects of pandemic-related distress.

    “Research further suggests that trait optimism and trait resilience may serve as buffers against the effects of pandemic-related distress (Taylor, 2019; Barzilay et al., 2020; Paredes et al., 2021).”

    From Predicting the Severity of Symptoms of the COVID Stress Syndrome From Personality Traits: A Prospective Network Analysis (2021) · cites this paper as Barzilay et al., 2020

    The Results report that higher resilience scores were associated with fewer COVID-19 worries and lower anxiety and depression; the Discussion describes a possible buffering effect. The paper does not report measuring trait optimism or show that optimism has a buffering effect. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Even fewer studies have focused on resilience during the 2020 pandemic.

    “To our knowledge, to date, few studies focused on positive outcomes during the 2020 pandemic [25, 26] and even fewer on resilience [27, 28].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barzilay, R., Moore, T. M., Greenberg, D. M., DiDomenico, G. E., Brown, L. A., White, L. K., Gur, R. C., & Gur, R. E.
Affiliations
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • Bar-Ilan University (IL)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Barzilay, Ran
Venue
Translational Psychiatry
Published
2020-08-20
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
291-291
ISSN
2158-3188 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3062617766
Cited by
634
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 114 · 2022: 195 · 2021: 206 · 2020: 22 · 2013: 1
FWCI
53.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Translational Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (K23-MH120437, R01-MH117014, R01-MH119219)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, resilience, COVID-19 stress, anxiety, depression, healthcare workers, self-reliance, emotion regulation, interpersonal relationships, neighborhood environment, financial burden, mental health
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pneumonia, Viral, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Stress, Psychological, Coronavirus Infections, Resilience, Psychological, Young Adult, Pandemics, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review