Cited by 108COVID-19 and Mental HealthMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Psychological flexibility in the context of COVID-19 adversity: Associations with distress

Open access
Kroska, Emily B., Roche, Anne I., Adamowicz, Jenna L., Stegall, Manny S.·2020·Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to hardship for individuals across the globe, and research to-date has indicated a significant impact of the pandemic on mental health functioning. In order to promote psychological resilience during this time, it is important to understand modifiable targets for clinical intervention. The current study examined demographic characteristics, pandemic-related adversity, and psychological flexibility in relation to general and peritraumatic distress in a sample of United States survey respondents during May of 2020. Participants were recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), N = 485. Participants completed measures of pandemic-related adversity, psychological flexibility components (openness to experience, behavioral awareness, and valued action), peritraumatic distress, and general distress. Hierarchical regression analyses examined whether demographic characteristics, pandemic-related adversity, and components of psychological flexibility were associated with general and peritraumatic distress. Results indicated that higher pandemic-related adversity, lower openness to experience, and lower behavioral awareness were significantly associated with higher general distress. Greater pandemic-related adversity, lower openness to experience, lower behavioral awareness, and higher valued action were significantly associated with higher peritraumatic distress. Adding the components of psychological flexibility to the model increased the amount of variance accounted for in both measures of distress. The results indicated that psychological flexibility components may be particularly important targets for prevention and intervention efforts in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. Transdiagnostic interventions, such as Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, that target psychological flexibility may be useful as the impact of the pandemic continues to unfold.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.07.011

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A growth of literature has identified psychological flexibility as an underlying process surrounding increases in mental health difficulties related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

    “A growth of literature has identified psychological flexibility as an underlying process surrounding the dramatic increases in mental health difficulties related to the COVID-19 pandemic (Dawson & Golijani-Moghaddam, 2020; Kroska et al., 2020; Pakenham et al., 2020).”

    From ACTing towards better living during COVID-19: The effects of Acceptance and Commitment therapy for individuals affected by COVID-19 (2022) · cites this paper as Kroska et al., 2020

    The Discussion identifies psychological flexibility as a potential modifiable process that may reduce distress during COVID-19 adversity. The paper reports associations with distress, however, rather than establishing that psychological flexibility underlies the claimed dramatic increases in mental health difficulties. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Psychological flexibility is a significant protective factor against the adverse effects of general and peritraumatic distress.

    “prior studies suggest that psychological flexibility is a significant protective factor against the adverse effects of general and peritraumatic distress [63].”

    From Examining the associations between psychological flexibility, mindfulness, psychosomatic functioning, and anxiety during the covid-19 pandemic: A path analysis (2020) · cites this paper as [63]

    The Discussion reports that higher openness and behavioral awareness were associated with lower general and peritraumatic distress, supporting an association for two components of psychological flexibility. But it also reports that valued action was positively associated with peritraumatic distress and explicitly says the single-timepoint study cannot establish causation. Calling psychological flexibility a protective factor therefore overstates the findings. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Psychological inflexibility exacerbates the detrimental impacts of COVID-19 on mental health.

    “Results from additional research have consistently demonstrated that psychological inflexibility exacerbates the detrimental impacts of COVID-19 on mental health (Dawson and Golijani-Moghaddam, 2020; Kroska et al., 2020; Pakenham et al., 2020).”

    From Dealing With the Pandemic of COVID-19 in Portugal: On the Important Role of Positivity, Experiential Avoidance, and Coping Strategies (2021) · cites this paper as Kroska et al., 2020

    The Abstract reports that lower openness to experience and behavioral awareness were associated with greater distress during the pandemic. But the Discussion says the single-timepoint study cannot establish causation; it does not show that psychological inflexibility exacerbates COVID-19’s impact on mental health. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • ACT may be well suited to pandemic distress because it builds psychological flexibility when stressors are unpredictable and uncontrollable.

    “Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is a promising intervention for pandemic-related distress because it promotes psychological flexibility in the face of unpredictable, uncontrollable stressors (e.g., Kroska et al., 2020).”
  • Recent literature points to ACT as a possible intervention for COVID-related distress.

    “recent literature is pointing towards ACT as a possible intervention to address COVID-related distress (Gloster, Lamnisos, et al., 2020; Kroska et al., 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kroska, E. B., Roche, A. I., Adamowicz, J. L., & Stegall, M. S.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Kroska, Emily B.
Venue
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
18
Pages
28-33
ISSN
2212-1447 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3047559965
Cited by
108
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 4
FWCI
7.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2021-07-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
psychological flexibility, COVID-19 pandemic, peritraumatic distress, general distress, openness to experience, behavioral awareness, valued action, psychological resilience, acceptance and commitment therapy, transdiagnostic treatment, mental health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review