Cited by 86Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsDigital Mental Health Interventions

Treatment of flying phobia using virtual reality: data from a 1-year follow-up using a multiple baseline design

Botella, C., Osma, J., Garcia‐Palacios, A., Quero, S., Baños, R.M.·2004·Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy

Abstract

Abstract The present work is a new contribution about the short‐ and long‐term efficacy of virtual reality (VR) exposure therapy for the treatment of flying phobia (FP). We present data from pre‐treatment, post‐treatment and 1‐year follow‐up assessments in a sample of nine participants using a multiple baseline design. The treatment programme included a main therapeutic component: VR exposure (six sessions), accompanied by one session of education about anxiety, flying and exposure. The VR software developed by our team is described. Our software included, besides the virtual scenario used by most researchers, the plane, two new scenarios: the room and the airport, developed to work with the patients anticipatory anxiety. The results obtained, at post‐treatment and 1 year after the completion of the treatment, support the efficacy of VR in the treatment of flying phobia. VR produced an activation of the fear and avoidance structures and a progressive decrement of fear, avoidance and belief in catastrophic thoughts. The scores in other specific self‐report meaures of flying phobia confirm these findings. After the treatment, all participants flew. Our data support the efficacy of VR for the treatment of flying phobia achieved by other studies. Our contribution to this field is the use of VR exposure as the only therapeutic component, the long‐term efficacy data, and the use of VR software for the treatment of anticipatory anxiety. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpp.404

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Virtual reality exposure therapy's effectiveness for the treatment of flying phobia has been demonstrated.

    “Virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) has become a popular alternative for in vivo exposure, and its effectiveness for the treatment of FP has been demonstrated (Botella et al., 2004; Cárdenas et al., 2016; Czerniak et al., 2016; da Costa et al., 2008; Riva et al., 2001; Rothbaum et al., 2006).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Botella, C., Osma, J., Garcia‐Palacios, A., Quero, S., & Baños, R. M.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Jaume I (ES)
  • Universitat de València (ES)
Corresponding author
Botella, C.
Venue
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-09
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
311-323
ISSN
  • 1063-3995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0879
OpenAlex
W1988625820
Cited by
86
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
virtual reality exposure therapy, anticipatory anxiety, long-term treatment efficacy, fear and avoidance, virtual reality software

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review