Cited by 220Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchSchizophrenia research and treatment

Definition, assessment and rate of psychotherapy side effects

Open access
Linden, Michael, Schermuly-Haupt, Marie-Luise·2014·World Psychiatry

Abstract

Psychotherapy is often seen as a first line treatment, because patients and therapists consider this mode of treatment harmless in comparison, for instance, to drug treatment. This assumption is supported by the fact that there are only limited scientific reports on psychotherapy side effects 1, 2. There is, however, some evidence which suggests that psychotherapy can have frequent or serious negative consequences, like all effective treatments 3-5. There are several reasons why awareness of psychotherapy side effects is limited and research on this issue is insufficient. First, the psychotherapist is the "producer" of treatment and therefore responsible, if not liable, for all negative effects, which results in a perceptional bias towards positive rather than negative effects 6. Second, psychotherapy does not only focus on symptoms but also on social behavior, so that the spectrum of possible negative effects is much broader than in pharmacotherapy 7. Third, there is even no consensus on what to call negative: for instance, when evaluating a manuscript on psychotherapy side effects, a reviewer wrote: "a divorce can be both positive and negative, and crying in therapy can reflect a painful experience but can also be a positive and therapeutic event". Fourth, there is a lack of differentiation between side effects and therapy failure or deterioration of illness 8. Fifth, there are no generally accepted instruments for the assessment of psychotherapy side effects and no rules on how to plan scientific studies or monitor side effects in randomized controlled clinical trials 2. There are indeed some instruments for the assessment of negative psychotherapy effects, although they are not widely used. They include the Vanderbilt Negative Indicator Scale 9, the Inventory of Negative Effects 10, the Unwanted Events and Adverse Treatment Reaction Checklist for Psychotherapy 11, 12 and the Experience of Therapy Questionnaire 13. Learning from the assessment of side effects in pharmacotherapy, a distinction must be made between side effects, unwanted events, adverse treatment reactions, treatment failure, malpractice effects, side effect profile, and contraindications. The assessment of side effects must start with the recording of "unwanted events". These are events which occur parallel to or in the context of treatment and which are burdensome to the patient and/or his environment, independent of whether they are unavoidable or even necessary to reach a treatment goal. Scares in surgery or crying in psychotherapy may be unavoidable or even necessary, but if there is a new treatment without this burden to the patient, the old procedure may no longer be ethically appropriate. The UE-ATR checklist 11 provides a list of areas where to look for unwanted events (Table 1). "Adverse treatment reactions" are all unwanted events which are caused by the treatment. This requires the ascertainment of a causal relation between the unwanted events and the ongoing treatment. In many cases it will not be possible to make a final decision about the cause of an unwanted event. Therefore, a probability rating should be made: e.g., unrelated, probably unrelated, possibly related, probably related, definitely related to the treatment. Side effects are adverse reactions which are caused by a correct treatment, while malpractice effects are the consequence of an inappropriate treatment. Therefore, a decision must be made on the quality of treatment. Good treatment causes side effects, bad treatment malpractice effects, a distinction which is a prerequisite for the decriminalization of side effects. Side effects which occur routinely when applying a special type of treatment constitute the "side effect profile" of that treatment. These regularly occurring side effects must be taken into account in planning the therapy, and patients should be informed about the side effect profile before starting treatment. "Contraindications" are serious side effects which must be expected in special types of patients and which render not applicable that type of treatment in those patients. Finally, the clinical impact of side effects must be assessed. Based on intensity, duration and patient's impairment, a rating of severity is needed. For instance: mild, without consequences; moderate, distressing; severe, in need of countermeasures; very severe, lasting negative consequences; extremely severe, hospitalization required; or life threatening. A suicide would be "extremely severe"; a lay off at work "very severe"; an increase in anxiety "severe"; discussions with one's spouse "moderate"; crying in therapy "mild". At present, it is not possible to report precise data on the rate and type of side effects of different forms of psychotherapy. Only very few papers were found when searching in PsycINFO and PubMed, from 1954 until now, for journal articles which have in their title the key word "psychotherapy" in combination with "side effects" (PsycInfo: 12, PubMe

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wps.20153

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Barlow DH. Negative effects from psychological treatments. Am Psychol 2010;65:13-20.
  2. Ladwig I, Rief W, Nestoriuc Y. Hat Psychotherapie auch Neben- wirkungen? -Entwicklung des Inventars zur Erfassung Negativer Effekte von Psychotherapie (INEP). Verhaltenstherapie (in press).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Linden, M., & Schermuly-Haupt, M.-L.
Affiliations
  • Stiftung Charité (DE)
  • Research Group Psychosomatic Rehabilitation; Charité University Medicine Berlin; Department of Behavioral Medicine, Rehabilitation Centre Seehof; Lichterfelder Allee 35 14513 Teltow Germany
Venue
World Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-10
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
306-309
ISSN
1723-8617 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155424421
Cited by
220
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3
FWCI
5.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
unwanted events, treatment failure, side effect profile, contraindications, psychotherapist liability, randomized controlled trials, adverse event reporting, psychotherapy ethics, school dropout prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review