The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Copper‐Based Metal–Organic Porous Materials for CO2 Electrocatalytic Reduction to Alcohols
Abstract
The electrocatalytic reduction of CO 2 has been investigated using four Cu‐based metal–organic porous materials supported on gas diffusion electrodes, namely, (1) HKUST‐1 metal–organic framework (MOF), [Cu 3(μ 6‐C 9 H 3 O 6)2]n; (2) CuAdeAce MOF, [Cu 3(μ 3‐C 5 H 4 N 5)2]n; (3) CuDTA mesoporous metal–organic aerogel (MOA), [Cu(μ‐C 2 H 2 N 2 S 2)]n; and (4) CuZnDTA MOA, [Cu 0.6 Zn 0.4(μ‐C 2 H 2 N 2 S 2)]n. The electrodes show relatively high surface areas, accessibilities, and exposure of the Cu catalytic centers as well as favorable electrocatalytic CO 2 reduction performance, that is, they have a high efficiency for the production of methanol and ethanol in the liquid phase. The maximum cumulative Faradaic efficiencies for CO 2 conversion at HKUST‐1‐, CuAdeAce‐, CuDTA‐, and CuZnDTA‐based electrodes are 15.9, 1.2, 6, and 9.9 %, respectively, at a current density of 10 mA cm−2, an electrolyte‐flow/area ratio of 3 mL min cm−2, and a gas‐flow/area ratio of 20 mL min cm−2. We can correlate these observations with the structural features of the electrodes. Furthermore, HKUST‐1‐ and CuZnDTA‐based electrodes show stable electrocatalytic performance for 17 and 12 h, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How copper catalyzes the electroreduction of carbon dioxide into hydrocarbon fuels
Peterson, A. A., Abild-Pedersen, F., Studt, F., Rossmeisl, J., & Nørskov, J. K. (2010) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c0ee00071j · Cited by 3,784
New insights into the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide on metallic copper surfaces
Kuhl, K. P., Cave, E. R., Abram, D. N., & Jaramillo, T. F. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee21234j · Cited by 3,160
A review of catalysts for the electroreduction of carbon dioxide to produce low-carbon fuels
Qiao, J., Liu, Y., Hong, F., & Zhang, J. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c3cs60323g · Cited by 2,990
Carbon capture and storage update
Boot-Handford, M. E., Abanades, J. C., Anthony, E. J., Blunt, M. J., Brandani, S., Mac Dowell, N., Fernández, J. R., Ferrari, M.-C., Gross, R., Hallett, J. P., et al. (2014) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c3ee42350f · Cited by 2,386
Electroreduction of carbon monoxide to liquid fuel on oxide-derived nanocrystalline copper
Li, C. W., Ciston, J., & Kanan, M. W. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13249 · Cited by 1,728
Ren, D., Deng, Y., Handoko, A. D., Chen, C. S., Malkhandi, S., & Yeo, B. S. (2015) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/cs502128q · Cited by 930
Hod, I., Deria, P., Bury, W., Mondloch, J. E., Kung, C.-W., So, M., Sampson, M. D., Peters, A. W., Kubiak, C. P., Farha, O. K., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms9304 · Cited by 290
Metal–organic framework (MOF) aerogels with high micro- and macroporosity
Lohe, M. R., Rose, M., & Kaskel, S. (2009) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/b910175f · Cited by 286
Jia, F., Yu, X., & Zhang, L. (2014) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.002 · Cited by 228
Wang, Q., Dong, H., & Yu, H. (2014) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.08.017 · Cited by 126
Cited by
Carbon capture and conversion using metal–organic frameworks and MOF-based materials
Ding, M., Flaig, R. W., Jiang, H.-L., & Yaghi, O. M. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00829a · Cited by 2,616
Zhao, C., Dai, X., Yao, T., Chen, W., Wang, X., Wang, J., Yang, J., Wei, S., Wu, Y., & Li, Y. (2017) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.7b02736 · Cited by 1,365
Yang, H., Wu, Y., Li, G., Lin, Q., Hu, Q., Zhang, Q., Liu, J., & He, C. (2019) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.9b04907 · Cited by 788
Yaashikaa, P. R., Senthil Kumar, P., Varjani, S. J., & Saravanan, A. (2019) · Journal of CO2 Utilization · doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2019.05.017 · Cited by 508
Wang, Y.-R., Huang, Q., He, C.-T., Chen, Y., Liu, J., Shen, F.-C., & Lan, Y.-Q. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06938-z · Cited by 482
Metadata
- Authors
- Albo, J., Vallejo, D., Beobide, G., Castillo, O., Castaño, P., & Irabien, A.
- Venue
- ChemSusChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-08-25
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1100-1109
- ISSN
- 1864-5631 (ISSN-L)
- 1864-564X
- OpenAlex
- W2508280130
- Cited by
- 410
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 8.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Copper‐Based Metal–Organic Porous Materials for CO2 Electrocatalytic Reduction to Alcohols. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cssc.201600693
- The paper
- Albo, J., Vallejo, D., Beobide, G., Castillo, O., Castaño, P., & Irabien, A. (2017). Copper‐Based Metal–Organic Porous Materials for CO2 Electrocatalytic Reduction to Alcohols. ChemSusChem. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201600693
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
