Cited by 813Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and Assessment

Psychometric properties of a Persian‐language version of the Beck Depression Inventory‐Second edition: BDI‐II‐PERSIAN

Open access
Ghassemzadeh, Habibollah, Mojtabai, Ramin, Karamghadiri, Narges, Ebrahimkhani, Narges·2005·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is perhaps the most commonly used screening instrument for depression in the general population. We examined the psychometric properties of a Persian-language version of the second edition of this instrument (BDI-II) [Beck et al., 1996] in an Iranian college-student sample. In a sample of 125 student volunteers from two Iranian universities, we compared mean item scores on the BDI-II-Persian with those on the English-language version administered to North American college students, and assessed internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the BDI-II-Persian and its concurrent validity against a measure of negative automatic thoughts in depression, the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire [Hollon and Kendall, 1980]. We also examined the factor structure of the BDI-II-Persian through comparing the fit of various proposed models to the data using confirmatory factor analysis. The BDI-II-Persian had high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.87) and acceptable test-retest reliability (r=0.74). The instrument correlated strongly with the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire. In factor analysis, models with strongly correlated affective-cognitive and somatic-vegetative factors provided a better fit than models with one global factor. These data support the reliability and concurrent validity of the BDI-II-Persian as a measure of depressive symptoms in nonclinical samples.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.20070

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Whisman MA, Perez JE, Ramel W. 2000. Factor structure of the Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II) in a student sample. J Clin Psychol 56:545-551.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ghassemzadeh, H., Mojtabai, R., Karamghadiri, N., & Ebrahimkhani, N.
Affiliations
  • Roozbeh Hospital (IR)
  • Mount Sinai Beth Israel (US)
Corresponding author
Ghassemzadeh, Habibollah
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
185-192
ISSN
  • 1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6394
OpenAlex
W2110777573
Cited by
813
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 38
FWCI
5.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Vanderbilt University
  • Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
Beck Depression Inventory-II, depression screening, psychometric properties, factor structure, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire, negative automatic thoughts, university students, cross-cultural adaptation
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Female, Humans, Iran, Language, Male, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review