Cited by 112Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumBipolar Disorder and TreatmentPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

DOES SCREENING WITH THE MDQ AND EPDS IMPROVE IDENTIFICATION OF BIPOLAR DISORDER IN AN OBSTETRICAL SAMPLE?: Postpartum Screening with the MDQ and EPDS

Open access
Clark, Crystal T., Sit, Dorothy K.Y., Driscoll, Kara, Eng, Heather F., Confer, Andrea L., Luther, James F., Wisniewski, Stephen R., Wisner, Katherine L.·2015·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women with bipolar disorder (BD) are at high risk for postpartum affective episodes and psychosis. Although validated screening tools are available for postpartum unipolar depression, few screening tools for hypomania/mania exist. Screening tools for BD in the postpartum period are essential for improving detection and planning appropriate treatment. We evaluated whether adding the Mood Disorders Questionnaire (MDQ) to the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) increased the identification of BD in the early postpartum period. METHODS: Women (N = 1,279) who delivered a live infant and screened positive on the EPDS and/or MDQ at 4-6 weeks postbirth were invited to undergo an in-home Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID). RESULTS: Positive EPDS and/or MDQ screens occurred in 12% of the sample (n = 155). In home SCID diagnostic interviews were completed in 93 (60%) of the mothers with positive screens. BD was the primary diagnosis in 37% (n = 34). Women with BD screened positive on the EPDS and/or MDQ as follows: EPDS+/MDQ+ (n = 14), EPDS+/MDQ- (n = 17), and EPDS-/MDQ+ (n = 3). The MDQ identified 50% (17/34) of the women with BD and 6 additional cases of BD when the MDQ question regarding how impaired the mother perceived herself was excluded from the screen criterion. CONCLUSION: Addition of the MDQ to the EPDS improved the distinction of unipolar depression from bipolar depression at the level of screening in 50% of women with traditional MDQ scoring and by nearly 70% when the MDQ was scored without the impairment criterion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.22373

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [41]Hirschfeld RM Williams JB Spitzer RL Development and validation of a screening instrument for bipolar spectrum disorder: the Mood Disorder Questionnaire American Journal of Psychiatry 2000 157 1873 1875 11058490
  2. [50]Chessick CA Dimidjian S Screening for bipolar disorder during pregnancy and the postpartum period Archives of women's mental health 2010 13 233 248 20198393

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clark, C. T., Sit, D. K. Y., Driscoll, K., Eng, H. F., Confer, A. L., Luther, J. F., Wisniewski, S. R., & Wisner, K. L.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System (US)
Corresponding author
Clark, Crystal T.
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-06-08
Volume
32
Issue
7
Pages
518-526
ISSN
1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1899135399
Cited by
112
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 7
FWCI
27.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K12 HD055884)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH 071825)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
bipolar disorder, postpartum period, screening, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, hypomania, mania, major depressive disorder, postpartum psychosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Bipolar Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Substance-Related Disorders, Postpartum Period, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review