Cited by 21Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

NATURALISTIC COURSE OF MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER PREDICTED BY CLINICAL AND STRUCTURAL NEUROIMAGING DATA: A 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP: Research Article: Prediction of Long-Term Depressive Outcomes

Open access
Serra-Blasco, Maria, de Diego-Adeliño, Javier, Vives-Gilabert, Yolanda, Trujols, Joan, Puigdemont, Dolors, Carceller-Sindreu, Mar, Pérez, Victor, Álvarez, Enric +1 more·2016·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite its high recurrence rate, major depression disorder (MDD) still lacks neurobiological markers to optimize treatment selection. The aim of this study was to examine the prognostic potential of clinical and structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) in the long-term MDD clinical outcomes (COs). METHODS: Forty-nine MDD patients were grouped into one of four different CO categories according to their trajectory: recovery, partial remission, remission recurrence, and chronic depression. Regression models including baseline demographic, clinical, and sMRI data were used for predicting patients' COs and symptom severity 5 years later. RESULTS: The model including only clinical data explained 32.4% of the variance in COs and 55% in HDRS, whereas the model combining clinical and sMRI data increased up to 52/68%, respectively. A bigger volume of right anterior cingulate gyrus was the variable that best predicted COs. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the addition of sMRI brain data to clinical information in depressive patients can significantly improve the prediction of their COs. The dorsal part of the right anterior cingulate gyrus may act as a potential biomarker of long-term clinical trajectories.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.22522

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a 5-year naturalistic prospective study, gray matter volume in the right dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and right inferior frontal gyrus contributed to disease trajectory predictions; larger volume in these areas predicted better clinical outcome and lower depressive symptoms over 5 years.

    “study, GMV in the right dACC and right inferior frontal gyrus contributed to disease trajectory predictions; specifically, larger volume in these areas predicted better clinical outcome and lower depressive symptoms over 5 years [83].”

    From Prefrontal cortex and depression (2022) · cites this paper as [83]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Smaller hippocampal and medial prefrontal cortex volumes are consistently linked to non-remission or treatment resistance in major depressive disorder.

    “and non-remission/treatment resistance (28,31–38).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [25]25. Ashburner J. VBM Tutorial; 2010:1-14.
  2. [27]27. Dale AM, Fischl B, Sereno MI. Cortical surface-based anal- ysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 1999;9(2):179-194.
  3. [44]44. McEwen BS. The neurobiology of stress: from serendipity to clin- ical relevance. Brain Res 2000;886:172-189.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Serra-Blasco, M., de Diego-Adeliño, J., Vives-Gilabert, Y., Trujols, J., Puigdemont, D., Carceller-Sindreu, M., Pérez, V., Álvarez, E., & Portella, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • Department of Psychiatry, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau); Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB); Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM); Barcelona Catalonia Spain
  • INNDACYT; Barcelona Spain
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-05-09
Volume
33
Issue
11
Pages
1055-1064
ISSN
1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2359286288
Cited by
21
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (PI 10/00372, PI 13/01057)
  • Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca of the Generalitat de Catalunya (FI-DGR-2012)
  • Instituto Carlos III and European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) (CP10-00393)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
major depressive disorder, long-term clinical outcomes, prognostic factors, structural MRI, chronic depression, clinical trajectories, symptom severity prediction, neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review