Cited by 89Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementSkin Diseases and DiabetesFoot and Ankle Surgery

Prevention of foot ulcers in persons with diabetes at risk of ulceration: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Open access
van Netten, Jaap J., Raspovic, Anita, Lavery, Lawrence A., Monteiro‐Soares, Matilde, Paton, Joanne, Rasmussen, Anne, Sacco, Isabel C. N., Bus, Sicco A.·2024·Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews

Abstract

AIMS: Prevention of foot ulcers in persons with diabetes is important to help reduce the substantial burden on both individual and health resources. A comprehensive analysis of reported interventions is needed to better inform healthcare professionals about effective prevention. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the effectiveness of interventions to prevent foot ulcers in persons with diabetes who are at risk thereof. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched the available scientific literature in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane databases and trial registries for original research studies on preventative interventions. Both controlled and non-controlled studies were eligible for selection. Two independent reviewers assessed risk of bias of controlled studies and extracted data. A meta-analysis (using Mantel-Haenszel's statistical method and random effect models) was done when >1 RCT was available that met our criteria. Evidence statements, including the certainty of evidence, were formulated according to GRADE. RESULTS: From the 19,349 records screened, 40 controlled studies (of which 33 were Randomised Controlled Trials [RCTs]) and 103 non-controlled studies were included. We found moderate certainty evidence that temperature monitoring (5 RCTs; risk ratio [RR]: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.31-0.84) and pressure-optimised therapeutic footwear or insoles (2 RCTs; RR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.26-1.47) likely reduce the risk of plantar foot ulcer recurrence in people with diabetes at high risk. Further, we found low certainty evidence that structured education (5 RCTs; RR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.37-1.19), therapeutic footwear (3 RCTs; RR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.24-1.17), flexor tenotomy (1 RCT, 7 non-controlled studies, no meta-analysis), and integrated care (3 RCTs; RR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.58-1.06) may reduce the risk of foot ulceration in people with diabetes at risk for foot ulceration. CONCLUSIONS: Various interventions for persons with diabetes at risk for foot ulceration with evidence of effectiveness are available, including temperature monitoring (pressure-optimised) therapeutic footwear, structured education, flexor tenotomy, and integrated foot care. With hardly any new intervention studies published in recent years, more effort to produce high-quality RCTs is urgently needed to further improve the evidence base. This is especially relevant for educational and psychological interventions, for integrated care approaches for persons at high risk of ulceration, and for interventions specifically targeting persons at low-to-moderate risk of ulceration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/dmrr.3652

Cites

158 of 158 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A multidisciplinary team approach (structured diabetic foot services) reduces diabetes-related lower extremity amputation.

    “A multidisciplinary team approach (structured diabetic foot services) has been shown to reduce diabetes-related lower extremity amputation.85”

    From Diabetic Foot Ulcers (2023) · cites this paper as [85]

    The integrated-care discussion reports possible reductions in foot ulcers, not amputations. In §7.5 (Methodological considerations and limitations; page unavailable), the review says it did not consider amputation as a primary outcome and excluded population-based studies reporting only amputation prevention. The References list studies on multidisciplinary teams and amputations, but this review does not itself report the claimed effect. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Jeffcoate WJ, Bus SA, Game FL, et al. Reporting standards of studies and papers on the prevention and management of foot ulcers in diabetes: required details and markers of good quality. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(9):781-788. https://doi.org/10. 1016/s2213-8587(16)30012-2 · DOI
  2. van NETTEN ET AL. -27 of 31 15207560, 0, · DOI
  3. Reike H, Bruning A, Rischbieter E, Vogler F, Angelkort B. Recur- rence of foot lesions in patients with diabetic foot syndrome: in- fluence of custom-molded orthotic device. Diabetes Stoffwechs. 1997(6):107-113.
  4. Baumann R. Efficacy of industrially produced protective footwear for the 'diabetic foot': an observational study. Diabetes Stoffwechs. 1996;5:107-112 (German).
  5. Albert SF, Christensen LC. Rigid foot orthoses in the treatment of the neuropathic diabetic foot. Low Extrem. 1996;3:97-105.
  6. Piaggesi A, Romanelli M, Fallani E, Baccetti F, Navalesi R. Poly- urethane foam sheets for relieving pressure from diabetic neuro- pathic plantar ulcers. J Dermatol Treat. 2000;11(1):39-42.
  7. Rogers K, Otter SJ, Birch I. The effect of PORON and plastazote insoles on forefoot plantar pressures. Br J Podiatry. 2006;9(4): 111-114.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Netten, J. J., Raspovic, A., Lavery, L. A., Monteiro‐Soares, M., Paton, J., Rasmussen, A., Sacco, I. C. N., & Bus, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
  • La Trobe University (AU)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • University of Plymouth (GB)
  • Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen (DK)
  • Physical Therapy Speech and Occupational Therapy Department School of Medicine University of São Paulo São Paulo Brazil
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-05-27
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
e3652-e3652
ISSN
  • 1520-7552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-7560
OpenAlex
W4378567045
Cited by
89
References
158
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 15
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PEARL (University of Plymouth) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PEARL (University of Plymouth) (submittedVersion)
  • La Trobe University
Funders
  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF16SA0024126-3)
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Diseases and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Foot and Ankle Surgery
Keywords
foot ulcer prevention, diabetes mellitus, diabetic foot, temperature monitoring, insoles, quality of evidence, cost-effectiveness, quality of life, health care utilization, patient-reported outcomes
MeSH terms
Humans, Risk Factors, Diabetic Foot

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review