Cited by 36Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Dissociation proneness and pain hyposensitivity in current and remitted borderline personality disorder

Open access
Chung, Boo Young, Hensel, Saskia, Schmidinger, Ilinca, Bekrater‐Bodmann, Robin, Flor, Herta·2020·European Journal of Pain

Abstract

Background: Stress‐related dissociation has been shown to negatively co‐vary with pain perception in current borderline personality disorder (cBPD). While remission of the disorder (rBPD) is associated with normalized pain perception, it remains unclear whether dissociation proneness is still enhanced in this group and how this feature interacts with pain sensitivity. Methods: Twenty‐five cBPD patients, 20 rBPD patients and 24 healthy controls (HC) participated in an experiment using the script‐driven imagery approach. We presented a personalized stressful and neutral narrative. After listening to the scripts, dissociation and heat pain thresholds (HPT) were assessed. Results: Compared to HC, cBPD patients showed enhanced dissociation and exhibited significantly enhanced HPT in the neutral condition, whereas rBPD participants were in between. After listening to the stress script, both clinical groups exhibited enhanced dissociation scores. Current BPD participants responded with significantly higher HPT, whereas rBPD only showed a trend in the same direction. However, both BPD groups showed significantly increased HPT compared to the HC in the stress condition, but did not differ from each other. Dissociation proneness correlated significantly positively with pain hyposensitivity only in cBPD. Conclusion: Dissociation proneness is enhanced in both BPD groups. This feature is clearly positively related to pain hyposensitivity in cBPD, but not in rBPD. However, the data indicate that stress causes the pain perception in rBPD to drift away from that obtained in HC. These results highlight the volatile state of BPD remission and might have important implications for the care of BPD patients in the remitted stage. Significance: Both current (cBPD) and remitted borderline personality disorder (rBPD) patients show enhanced proneness to dissociation. This feature is significantly linked with pain hyposensitivity in cBPD in a paradigm that induces stress using a script‐driven imagery approach, whereas this connection cannot be observed in rBPD. However, in the stress compared to the neutral condition, rBPD participants also show pain hyposensitivity compared to healthy controls. This study provides new insights into the pain processing mechanisms of BPD and its remission.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ejp.1567

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BPD often involves pain analgesia related to the use of dissociation, both in current and (when exposed to stressors) remitted BPD cases.

    “BPD often involves pain analgesia related to the use of dissociation, both in current and (when exposed to stressors) remitted BPD cases [17].”

    From Complex PTSD and borderline personality disorder (2021) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Discussion reports reduced pain sensitivity in current BPD and in remitted BPD after a stressful script. It also says dissociation proneness was linked to pain hyposensitivity in current BPD, but not in remitted BPD; the claim overextends that relationship to remitted cases. (LLM, conf=0.93)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ehlers, A., Steil, R., Winter, H., & Foa, E. B. (1996). Deutsche Übersetzung der Posttraumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale (PDS). Oxford: University, Warneford Hospital.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chung, B. Y., Hensel, S., Schmidinger, I., Bekrater‐Bodmann, R., & Flor, H.
Affiliations
Heidelberg University (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Bekrater‐Bodmann, Robin
  • Flor, Herta
Venue
European Journal of Pain
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-04-15
Volume
24
Issue
7
Pages
1257-1268
ISSN
  • 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2149
OpenAlex
W3013231812
Cited by
36
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FL 156/35‐1, FL 156/35-2, BE 5723/1‐2)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
borderline personality disorder, pain perception, stress-induced pain, thermal pain threshold, script-driven imagery, pain processing
MeSH terms
Borderline Personality Disorder, Dissociative Disorders, Humans, Pain, Pain Threshold, Pain Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review