Cited by 54Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPediatric Pain Management TechniquesPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Age differences in cognitive–affective processes in adults with chronic pain

Open access
Murray, Caitlin B., Patel, Kushang V., Twiddy, Hanah, Sturgeon, John A., Palermo, Tonya M.·2021·European Journal of Pain

Abstract

Background: Chronic pain is associated with significant physical and psychological impairments across the adult lifespan. However, there is a relative gap in knowledge on individual differences that predict pain‐related functioning. The current study highlights one important source of individual variation: age. Methods: We used cross‐sectional data from a large treatment‐seeking cohort of 2,905 adults (M age = 46.6 [13.1]; 71.8% women) presenting to a tertiary pain centre in the United Kingdom to determine age differences in cognitive‐affective processes (catastrophizing, acceptance, self‐efficacy), including their differential patterns and effects on disability and depression. Results: Older adults (ages 65–75) were found to experience higher pain acceptance and pain self‐efficacy compared to both middle‐aged (ages 40–64) and young adult (ages 18–39) age groups. Older adults also experienced lower levels of catasophizing compared to middle‐age adults. Testing age as a moderator, we found that the relationships of pain self‐efficacy and acceptance with depression as well as the relationship between pain self‐efficacy and disability were comparatively weakest among older adults and strongest among young adults. Similarly, the relationship between pain catastrophizing and depression was relatively stronger for young and middle‐aged adults compared to older adults. Conclusions: Age‐related differences in psychological mechanisms that influence pain‐related functioning present unique challenges and opportunities for scientists and clinicians to improve our understanding and treatment of pain across the lifespan. Additional work is needed to refine our knowledge of age‐related differences in cognitive‐affective, biopsychosocial dimensions of chronic pain and to develop and test the efficacy of age‐tailored interventions. Significance: Our cross‐sectional analysis of 2,905 treatment‐seeking adults with chronic pain presenting to a tertiary care center in the United Kingdom revealed distinct age differences in cognitive‐affective linked to disability and depression. This study contributes to the limited knowledge on age‐related variance in psychological mechanisms underlying adjustment to chronic pain. Promising avenues for future research include refining our understanding of age‐related differences in cognitive–affective, biopsychosocial dimensions of chronic pain and elucidating the most salient treatment targets among different age groups.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ejp.1725

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murray, C. B., Patel, K. V., Twiddy, H., Sturgeon, J. A., & Palermo, T. M.
Affiliations
  • Seattle Children's Research Institute (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Walton Centre (GB)
Corresponding author
Murray, Caitlin B.
Venue
European Journal of Pain
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-01-24
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
1041-1052
ISSN
  • 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2149
OpenAlex
W3120625521
Cited by
54
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (F32 HD097807)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
chronic pain, age differences, pain catastrophizing, pain acceptance, pain self-efficacy, depression, disability, cognitive and affective processes, older adults, biopsychosocial model
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cognition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review