Cited by 45Mass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsElectrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics

New insight into suction and dilution effects in CE coupled to MS via an ESI interface. II – Dilution effect

Mokaddem, Meriem, Gareil, Pierre, Belgaied, Jamel‐Eddine, Varenne, Anne·2009·ELECTROPHORESIS

Abstract

The hyphenation of CE with MS is nowadays accepted as a powerful analytical approach. As far as ESI, the most common interface, is concerned, one challenge is to provide the most sensitive as well as quantitative information, which is quite a difficult task, as it is linked, among other factors, to suction and dilution effects. In the coaxial ESI configuration, it has been previously demonstrated that suction effect depends on many parameters inherent to the ESI interface geometry, the prevailing ones being the CE capillary protrusion from the interface needle, the sheath liquid (SL) and the overall BGE flow rates and velocity profile. In this paper, dilution effect is studied, as the CE electrolyte is mixed with SL at the interface. Considering peak intensity and efficiency, this effect was studied as a function of the various parameters of the interface (capillary protrusion from the SL tube, nebulizing gas, SL and CE electrolyte flow rates) or of the source (skimmer and ESI voltages, drying gas flow rate and temperature). It appears that the dilution effect seems slightly lower than what can be anticipated from the proportions of the liquid flow rates. This study also indicates that suction effect has to be considered first to better understand the dilution phenomenon, as suction effect leads to an increase in peak intensity, before a dilution effect appears.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/elps.200800480

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mokaddem, M., Gareil, P., Belgaied, J., & Varenne, A.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • National Institute of Applied Science and Technology (TN)
Corresponding author
Varenne, Anne
Venue
ELECTROPHORESIS
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-05
Volume
30
Issue
10
Pages
1692-1697
ISSN
  • 0173-0835 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2683
OpenAlex
W2164320954
Cited by
45
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Electrophoresis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
Keywords
capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry, dilution effect, suction effect, peak intensity, maximum efficiency
MeSH terms
Mass Spectrometry, Temperature, Electrophoresis, Capillary, Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review