Cited by 61Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications

CE–ESI‐MS for bottom‐up proteomics: Advances in separation, interfacing and applications

Heemskerk, Anthonius A.M., Deelder, André M., Mayboroda, Oleg A.·2016·Mass Spectrometry Reviews

Abstract

With the development of more sensitive hyphenation strategies for capillary electrophoresis–electrospray‐mass spectrometry the technique has reemerged as technique with high separation power combined with high sensitivity in the analysis of peptides and protein digests. This review will discuss the newly developed hyphenation strategies for CE–ESI‐MS and their application in bottom‐up proteomics as well as the applications in the same time span, 2009 to present, using co‐axial sheathliquid. Subsequently all separate aspects in the development of a CE–ESI‐MS method for bottom‐up proteomics shall be discussed, highlighting certain applications and discussing pros and cons of the various choices. The separation of peptides in a capillary electrophoresis system is discussed including the great potential for modeling of this migration of peptides due to the simple electrophoretic separation process. Furthermore, the technical aspects of method development are discussed, namely; background electrolyte choice, coating of the separation capillary and chosen loading method. Finally, conclusions and an outlook on future developments in the field of bottom‐up proteomics by CE–ESI‐MS will be provided. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Mass Spec Rev 35:259–271, 2016.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mas.21432

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A potential limitation of the sheath-liquid interface is that high sheath-liquid flow dilutes the analyte and can cause sensitivity loss.

    “A potential limitation of the sheath-liquid interface is that the high flow rate of the sheath-liquid dilutes the analyte, thereby causing a potential loss in sensitivity5,13.”
  • tITP requires optimization of both electrolyte concentrations and loading volume for efficient stacking of target analytes.

    “tITP requires an optimization of both electrolyte concentrations and loading volume to enable efficient stacking of the target analytes13,27,65,120–122.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heemskerk, A. A. M., Deelder, A. M., & Mayboroda, O. A.
Affiliations
Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Corresponding author
Heemskerk, Anthonius A.M.
Venue
Mass Spectrometry Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-05-23
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
259-271
ISSN
  • 0277-7037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2787
OpenAlex
W1575991501
Cited by
61
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mass Spectrometry Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Keywords
shotgun proteomics, peptide separation, supporting electrolyte, capillary coating
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Peptide Mapping, Specimen Handling, Systems Integration, Electrophoresis, Capillary, Proteome, Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review