Cited by 61Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

A Double Burden: Emotional Eating and Lack of Cognitive Reappraisal in Eating Disordered Women

Danner, Unna N., Evers, Catharine, Stok, F. Marijn, van Elburg, Annemarie A., de Ridder, Denise T. D.·2012·European Eating Disorders Review

Abstract

Objective: To examine the influence of emotional eating and lack of cognitive reappraisal on eating pathology in women with binge‐purge and restricting type eating disorders. Method: Women with a diagnosis of anorexia or bulimia nervosa according to the DSM‐IV‐tr (n = 50) and non‐clinical women without eating disorders (n = 52) were asked about emotional eating tendencies, adaptive emotion regulation strategies (cognitive reappraisal) and eating pathology symptoms. Results: In binge‐purging women, emotional eating with limited use of cognitive reappraisal predicted level of eating pathology but not in the restricting and non‐clinical women. Discussion: Emotional eating tendencies in combination with a low tendency to use cognitive reappraisal may influence the severity of eating pathology in individuals with binge‐purge behaviours. Evidently, patients with these characteristics require a therapy that addresses adaptive emotion regulation skills. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/erv.2184

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Danner, U. N., Evers, C., Stok, F. M., van Elburg, A. A., & de Ridder, D. T. D.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Altrecht Eating Disorders Rintveld, Altrecht Mental Health Institute The Netherlands
  • Department of Clinical and Health Psychology Utrecht University The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Danner, Unna N.
Venue
European Eating Disorders Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-05-15
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
490-495
ISSN
  • 1072-4133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0968
OpenAlex
W1853405723
Cited by
61
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Eating Disorders Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
emotional eating, cognitive reappraisal, eating disorders, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, restrictive eating, emotion regulation, women
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anorexia Nervosa, Bulimia, Cognition, Emotions, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Body Mass Index, Bulimia Nervosa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review