Cited by 432Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsCardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling

Clinical Phenogroups in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Open access
Cohen, Jordana B., Schrauben, Sarah J., Zhao, Lei, Basso, Michael D., Cvijic, Mary Ellen, Li, Zhuyin, Yarde, Melissa, Wang, Zhaoqing +10 more·2020·JACC Heart Failure

Abstract

Objectives This study sought to assess if clinical phenogroups differ in comprehensive biomarker profiles, cardiac and arterial structure/function, and responses to spironolactone therapy.Background Previous studies identified distinct subgroups (phenogroups) of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).Methods Among TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial) participants, we performed latent-class analysis to identify HFpEF phenogroups based on standard clinical features and assessed differences in multiple biomarkers measured from frozen plasma; cardiac and arterial structure/function measured with echocardiography and arterial tonometry; prognosis; and response to spironolactone.Results Three HFpEF phenogroups were identified. Phenogroup 1 (n = 1,214) exhibited younger age, higher prevalence of smoking, preserved functional class, and the least evidence of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and arterial stiffness. Phenogroup 2 (n = 1,329) was older, with normotrophic concentric LV remodeling, atrial fibrillation, left atrial enlargement, large-artery stiffening, and biomarkers of innate immunity and vascular calcification. Phenogroup 3 (n = 899) demonstrated more functional impairment, obesity, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, concentric LV hypertrophy, high renin, and biomarkers of tumor necrosis factor-alpha-mediated inflammation, liver fibrosis, and tissue remodeling. Compared with phenogroup 1, phenogroup 3 exhibited the highest risk of the primary endpoint of cardiovascular death, heart failure hospitalization, or aborted cardiac arrest (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.44; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.79 to 4.24); phenogroups 2 and 3 demonstrated similar all-cause mortality (phenotype 2 HR: 2.36; 95% CI: 1.89 to 2.95; phenotype 3 HR: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.77 to 2.87). Spironolactone randomized therapy was associated with a more pronounced reduction in the risk of the primary endpoint in phenogroup 3 (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.59 to 0.95; p for interaction = 0.016). Results were similar after excluding participants from Eastern Europe.Conclusions We identified important differences in circulating biomarkers, cardiac/arterial characteristics, prognosis, and response to spironolactone across clinical HFpEF phenogroups. These findings suggest distinct underlying mechanisms across clinically identifiable phenogroups of HFpEF that may benefit from different targeted interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.09.009

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In TOPCAT, three phenogroups were identified, one of which represented by 'Obese, diabetic with advanced symptoms'; these subjects exhibited the worst overall prognosis and the highest levels of biomarkers of TNF-α mediated inflammation.

    “In a recent study in participants of TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial), three phenogroups were identified, one of which represented by “Obese, diabetic with advanced symptoms”. These subjects exhibited the worst overall prognosis and the highest levels of biomarkers of TNF-α mediated inflammation [72].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohen, J. B., Schrauben, S. J., Zhao, L., Basso, M. D., Cvijic, M. E., Li, Z., Yarde, M., Wang, Z., Bhattacharya, P. T., Chirinos, D. A., Prenner, S., Zamani, P., Seiffert, D. A., Car, B. D., Gordon, D. A., Margulies, K., Cappola, T., & Chirinos, J. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) (US)
  • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Chirinos, Julio A.
Venue
JACC Heart Failure
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
172-184
ISSN
2213-1779 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3000089361
Cited by
432
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 64 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 22
FWCI
32.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JACC Heart Failure (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • AstraZeneca
  • MyoKardia
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Sanofi
  • Bayer
  • Microsoft
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • American College of Radiology Imaging Network
  • Merck Sharp and Dohme
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
Keywords
heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, spironolactone, biomarker profiles, latent class analysis, TOPCAT trial, left ventricular hypertrophy, arterial stiffness, inflammation, vascular calcification, cardiovascular mortality, heart failure hospitalization, atrial fibrillation, left atrial enlargement, renin, TNF-α, liver fibrosis, arterial tonometry
MeSH terms
Aged, Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists, Echocardiography, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Phenotype, Prognosis, Spironolactone, Stroke Volume, Treatment Outcome, Ventricular Remodeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review