Cited by 48Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyForensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Joint testing of genotype and ancestry association in admixed families

Open access
Tang, Hua, Siegmund, David O., Johnson, Nicholas A., Romieu, Isabelle, London, Stephanie J.·2010·Genetic Epidemiology

Abstract

Current genome-wide association studies (GWAS) often involve populations that have experienced recent genetic admixture. Genotype data generated from these studies can be used to test for association directly, as in a non-admixed population. As an alternative, these data can be used to infer chromosomal ancestry, and thus allow for admixture mapping. We quantify the contribution of allele-based and ancestry-based association testing under a family-design, and demonstrate that the two tests can provide non-redundant information. We propose a joint testing procedure, which efficiently integrates the two sources information. The efficiencies of the allele, ancestry and combined tests are compared in the context of a GWAS. We discuss the impact of population history and provide guidelines for future design and analysis of GWAS in admixed populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gepi.20520

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Based on a combination of simulation and theory, we have previously established a genome-wide significant criterion of p<7×10−6 for this ancestry-based mapping approach.

    “Based on a combination of simulation and theory, we have previously established a genome-wide significant criterion of p<7×10−6 for this ancestry-based mapping approach [51].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tang, H., Siegmund, D. O., Johnson, N. A., Romieu, I., & London, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (MX)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Tang, Hua
Venue
Genetic Epidemiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-10-28
Volume
34
Issue
8
Pages
783-791
ISSN
  • 0741-0395 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2272
OpenAlex
W2158987779
Cited by
48
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetic Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National University of Singapore
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (HG000848)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM073059, R01GM073059)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES049019, ES025045, ZIAES049019, ZIAES025045)
  • Division of Mathematical Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
genetic admixture, admixture mapping, joint testing, genome-wide association study, demographic history, test efficiency
MeSH terms
Alleles, Asthma, Child, Chromosome Mapping, Chromosomes, Human, Genetics, Population, Genotype, Humans, Parents, Genome, Human, Confidence Intervals, Mexican Americans, Black People, White People, American Indian or Alaska Native, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review