Cited by 228Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Microglial repopulation resolves inflammation and promotes brain recovery after injury: RICE et al.

Open access
Rice, Rachel A., Pham, Jason, Lee, Rafael J., Najafi, Allison R., West, Brian L., Green, Kim N.·2017·Glia

Abstract

Microglia mediate chronic neuroinflammation following central nervous system (CNS) disease or injury, and in doing so, damage the local brain environment by impairing recovery and contributing to disease processes. Microglia are critically dependent on signaling through the colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) and can be eliminated via administration of CSF1R inhibitors. Resolving chronic neuroinflammation represents a universal goal for CNS disorders, but long-term microglial elimination may not be amenable to clinical use. Notably, withdrawal of CSF1R inhibitors stimulates new microglia to fully repopulate the CNS, affording an opportunity to renew this cellular compartment. To that end, we have explored the effects of acute microglial elimination, followed by microglial repopulation, in a mouse model of extensive neuronal loss. Neuronal loss leads to a prolonged neuroinflammatory response, characterized by the presence of swollen microglia expressing CD68 and CD45, as well as elevated levels of cytokines, chemokines, complement, and other inflammatory signals. These collective responses are largely resolved by microglial repopulation. Furthermore, microglial repopulation promotes functional recovery in mice, with elevated plus maze performance matching that of uninjured mice, despite the loss of 80% of hippocampal neurons. Analyses of synaptic surrogates revealed increases in PSD95 and synaptophysin puncta with microglial repopulation, suggesting that these cells sculpt and regulate the synaptic landscape. Thus, our results show that short-term microglial elimination followed by repopulation may represent a clinically feasible and novel approach to resolve neuroinflammatory events and promote brain recovery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/glia.23135

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Post-injury microglial depletion followed by microglial repopulation improves behavioral recovery, attenuates the lesion-induced neuroinflammatory response, and increases dendritic spin densities despite extensive neuronal loss in the hippocampus.

    “Recent studies using the same injury model confirmed that post-injury microglial depletion followed by microglial repopulation improves behavioral recovery, attenuates the lesion-induced neuroinflammatory response, and increases dendritic spin densities despite extensive neuronal loss in the hippocampus (240).”

    From The Inflammatory Continuum of Traumatic Brain Injury and Alzheimer’s Disease (2018) · cites this paper as [240]

    The Results sections report behavioral recovery and reduced inflammatory markers after microglial repopulation despite extensive hippocampal neuronal loss. However, the dendritic-spine Results report no significant difference in spine density between lesioned mice with and without repopulation; the reported increase was relative to uninjured controls. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Klein D Patzko A Schreiber D van Hauwermeiren A Baier M Groh J West BL Martini R 2015 Targeting the colony stimulating factor 1 receptor alleviates two forms of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease in mice Brain 26297559

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rice, R. A., Pham, J., Lee, R. J., Najafi, A. R., West, B. L., & Green, K. N.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Plexxikon (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Green, Kim N.
Venue
Glia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-03-02
Volume
65
Issue
6
Pages
931-944
ISSN
0894-1491 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2594403755
Cited by
228
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 6
FWCI
10.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Glia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (P50AG016573)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (F31NS086409, R01NS083801)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
microglial repopulation, CSF1R inhibitor, brain injury recovery, neuronal loss, hippocampal neurons, synaptic plasticity, PSD-95, synaptophysin, functional recovery, neuroinflammation
MeSH terms
Animals, Astrocytes, Brain, Calcium-Binding Proteins, Disease Models, Animal, Encephalitis, Female, Male, Mice, Transgenic, Microfilament Proteins, Neurons, Synapses, Neuroimmunomodulation, Cell Death, Microglia, Maze Learning, Recovery of Function, Cell Proliferation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review