Cited by 505Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor inhibition prevents microglial plaque association and improves cognition in 3xTg-AD mice

Open access
Dagher, Nabil N., Najafi, Allison R., Kayala, Kara M. Neely, Elmore, Monica R. P., White, Terra E., Medeiros, Rodrigo, West, Brian L., Green, Kim N.·2015·Journal of Neuroinflammation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Microglia are dependent upon colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) signaling for their survival in the adult brain, with administration of the dual CSF1R/c-kit inhibitor PLX3397 leading to the near-complete elimination of all microglia brainwide. Here, we determined the dose-dependent effects of a specific CSF1R inhibitor (PLX5622) on microglia in both wild-type and the 3xTg-AD mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: Wild-type mice were treated with PLX5622 for up to 21 days, and the effects on microglial numbers were assessed. 3xTg-AD mice were treated with PLX5622 for 6 or 12 weeks and effects on microglial numbers and pathology subsequently assessed. RESULTS: High doses of CSF1R inhibitor eliminate most microglia from the brain, but a 75% lower-dose results in sustained elimination of ~30 of microglia in both wild-type and 3xTg-AD mice. No behavioral or cognitive deficits were found in mice either depleted of microglia or treated with lower CSF1R inhibitor concentrations. Aged 3xTg-AD mice treated for 6 or 12 weeks with lower levels of PLX5622 resulted in improved learning and memory. Aβ levels and plaque loads were not altered, but microglia in treated mice no longer associated with plaques, revealing a role for the CSF1R in the microglial reaction to plaques, as well as in mediating cognitive deficits. CONCLUSIONS: We find that inhibition of CSF1R alone is sufficient to eliminate microglia and that sustained microglial elimination is concentration-dependent. Inhibition of the CSF1R at lower levels in 3xTg-AD mice prevents microglial association with plaques and improves cognition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12974-015-0366-9

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In mouse models of AD, genetic or pharmacological depletion of microglia prevented microglia association with amyloid plaques and neuronal loss, leading to improved learning and memory without affecting amyloid plaque load.

    “In mouse models of AD genetic or pharmacological depletion of microglia prevented microglia association with amyloid plaques and neuronal loss, which led to improved learning and memory without affecting amyloid plaque load in mouse brain (Dagher et al., 2015; Rice et al., 2015; Spangenberg et al., 2016).”

    From Alzheimer's-associated PU.1 expression levels regulate microglial inflammatory response (2021) · cites this paper as Dagher et al., 2015

    The Results and Discussion report that pharmacological CSF1R inhibition in aged 3xTg-AD mice reduced microglial association with plaques and improved learning and memory without changing Aβ levels or plaque load. This paper does not report that its treatment prevented neuronal loss, and its AD-mouse experiment used pharmacological inhibition rather than genetic depletion. The indexed passages have section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CXCL1, CCL5, LIF, and CSF1 regulate microglia activation, survival, and migration to the site of injury.

    “Notably, CXCL1, CCL5, LIF, and CSF1 regulate microglia activation, survival, and migration to the site of injury [169–172]”

    From Oligodendrocyte death and myelin loss in the cuprizone model: an updated overview of the intrinsic and extrinsic causes of cuprizone demyelination (2022) · cites this paper as [171]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) identifies CSF1 as a CSF1R ligand and reports that microglia require CSF1R signaling for survival. The Results (page unavailable) show that CSF1R inhibition reduces microglial migration toward Aβ-stimulated media. The paper does not establish that CXCL1, CCL5, or LIF regulate these functions, or that the named factors direct migration to a site of injury. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Stage 2 DAMs are essential early in AD but may become dysregulated and ultimately detrimental later in disease progression.

    “Although Stage 2 DAMs are essential early in AD, they may become dysregulated and ultimately detrimental later in disease progression.44–46”

    From TET2-mutant myeloid cells mitigate Alzheimer’s disease progression via CNS infiltration and enhanced phagocytosis in mice (2025) · cites this paper as [46]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) suggests that microglial association with Aβ deposits may be protective early in AD, while preventing that association may be beneficial later. The Introduction (page unavailable) also describes an initially beneficial microglial response that can become chronically inflammatory and damaging. Neither passage identifies Stage 2 DAMs specifically, and the Discussion presents early protection as a possibility rather than establishing that those cells are essential. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several groups have reported that microglial elimination via CSF1R inhibition improves behavioral performance and synaptic functioning independent of Aβ accumulation in multiple transgenic mouse models of AD (3xTg, 5xFAD, APP/PS1).

    “While the use of these agents is limited in experimental TBI studies, several groups have reported that microglial elimination [via colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) inhibition] improves behavioral performance and synaptic functioning independent of Aβ accumulation in multiple transgenic mouse models of AD (3xTg, 5xFAD, APP/PS1) (236–238).”

    From The Inflammatory Continuum of Traumatic Brain Injury and Alzheimer’s Disease (2018) · cites this paper as [238]

    The Abstract Results and Results section report improved learning and memory in CSF1R-inhibitor-treated 3xTg-AD mice, with unchanged Aβ levels and plaque loads. This paper does not report improved synaptic functioning; it studies 3xTg-AD mice, while the sentence’s other model-specific findings may be covered by its other citations. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Il34 and Csf1 are soluble factors that bind Csf1r and are necessary for microglial development and maintenance in vivo.

    “expression of Il34 and Csf1, soluble factors that bind to Csf1r and required for microglial development and maintenance in vivo49”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dagher, N. N., Najafi, A. R., Kayala, K. M. N., Elmore, M. R. P., White, T. E., Medeiros, R., West, B. L., & Green, K. N.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Plexxikon (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Green, Kim N.
Venue
Journal of Neuroinflammation
Published
2015-08-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
139-139
ISSN
1742-2094 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127381922
Cited by
505
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 1
FWCI
16.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroinflammation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1RO1NS083801, P50 AG016573, AG00538)
  • Whitehall Foundation (ᅟ)
  • American Federation for Aging Research (ᅟ)
  • Alzheimer's Association (ᅟ)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
CSF1R inhibition, PLX5622, microglia, Alzheimer's disease, 3xTg-AD mice, amyloid plaques, cognitive impairment, microglial depletion, dose-dependent effects, neuroinflammation, learning and memory
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Anxiety, Brain, Cell Count, Cell Line, Chemotaxis, Cognition Disorders, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Humans, Learning, Memory, Mice, Transgenic, Motor Activity, Receptors, Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor, Microglia, Mice, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review