Cited by 139Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAging, Health, and DisabilityHealth disparities and outcomes

Influence of social network characteristics on cognition and functional status with aging

Open access
Green, Ariel Frank, Rebok, George, Lyketsos, Constantine G.·2008·International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether more frequent engagement in larger social networks, and more emotional support protect against cognitive and functional decline with aging. Methods: We examined the influence of social networks on cognition and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) over a median interval of 10.9 years. Data were from the Baltimore follow‐up of the Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) study, a community‐based sample of adults in eastern Baltimore. Eight hundred and seventy‐four participants completed cognitive testing at both the third and fourth study waves (1993–1996 and 2003–2004) on the Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) and a delayed word recall task. Functional status at both waves was self‐reported on the Lawton‐Brody IADL scale. Social network characteristics, assessed at the third study wave, included network size, frequency of contact, and emotional support. Results: In cross‐sectional analyses at wave 3, larger networks were associated with higher MMSE and better delayed recall scores. This association persisted after adjustment for covariates. More emotional support was associated with better functional status, before and after adjustment. By contrast, social networks were not longitudinally associated with cognitive change, with two counter‐intuitive exceptions: more frequent contact and more emotional support were associated with worse delayed recall and IADL scores after adjustment. Conclusions: There was no evidence of a longitudinal association between social networks and cognition or IADLs, although a clear cross‐sectional association exists. Together, these findings suggest the emergence of social isolation in individuals declining in cognition and functioning, rather than a protective effect of social networks. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gps.2023

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Green et al. (2008) found a cross-sectional association between social networks and cognition and functional status in old age, but not a longitudinal association.

    “Green et al. (2008) found a cross-sectional association between social networks and cognition and functional status in old age, but not a longitudinal association.”

    From Social isolation, loneliness and health in old age: a scoping review (2017) · cites this paper as Green et al. 2008

  • Earlier studies on social factors and cognitive decline in middle-and older-aged adults have commonly followed a single measurement approach.

    “Earlier studies on social factors and cognitive decline in middle-and older-aged adults have commonly followed a single measurement approach.[13][14][15]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Green, A. F., Rebok, G., & Lyketsos, C. G.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Lyketsos, Constantine G.
Venue
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-05
Volume
23
Issue
9
Pages
972-978
ISSN
  • 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1166
OpenAlex
W2013283005
Cited by
139
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. Public Health Service (P01-AGO5146)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH47447, R01MH047447)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA026652)
  • National Center for Research Resources (5 T32 RR023523, P20RR023523)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
social networks, social isolation, cognitive decline, functional decline, instrumental activities of daily living, emotional support, network size, contact frequency, aging, older adults, Epidemiologic Catchment Area study
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Aged, Aging, Cognition Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Life Style, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Mental Recall, Social Support, Baltimore, Geriatric Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review