Cited by 79Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchDigital Mental Health Interventions

“Development and initial evaluation of the web-based self-management program “partner in balance” for family caregivers of people with early stage dementia: an exploratory mixed-methods study”

Open access
Boots, Lizzy MM, de Vugt, Marjolein E, Withagen, Hanneke EJ, Kempen, Gertrudis IJM, Verhey, Frans RJ·2016·JMIR Research Protocols

Abstract

BACKGROUND: People with dementia increasingly depend on informal caregivers. Internet-based self-management interventions hold considerable promise for meeting the educational and support needs of early stage dementia caregivers (EDCs) at a reduced cost. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) develop an online self-management program for EDC to increase self-efficacy and goal attainment, and (2) evaluate the program's feasibility and report preliminary data on effectiveness. METHODS: Based on the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions, a stepwise approach was adopted to explore potential user needs and develop and validate the content by means of (1) focus group discussions with dementia caregivers (N=28), (2) interviews with dementia care professionals (N=11), and (3) individual think-aloud usability tests with EDC (N=2) and experts (N=2). A pilot evaluation was conducted with EDC (N=17) to test the feasibility and establish preliminary effects. Self-report measures of feasibility were completed after the completion of intervention. Self-efficacy and goal attainment were evaluated before and after the intervention. RESULTS: The different steps provided useful information about the needs of potential users regarding the content and delivery of the program. This resulted in the newly developed "Partner in Balance" program. At the start, system failures resulted in a high noncompleter rate (7/17, 41%), but at the end, an acceptable feasibility score of 209 (range 54-234) was found. The convenience of completing the program at home, the tailored content, and the guidance (face-to-face and online) were appraised positively. Preliminary effects on caregiver self-efficacy (P<.05) and goal attainment (T>50) were promising. CONCLUSIONS: Adaptations were made to the program to limit the amount of system failures and prevent high noncompleter rates. As recommended by the MRC framework, confirming the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness is a valuable step toward examining the effectiveness of this newly developed intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register (NTR): NTR4217; http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=4217 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6f6B8lvRP).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/resprot.5142

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [43]American Psychiatric Association (APA) Neurocognitive Disorders Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th edition 2013 Washington DC APA
  2. [55]Savitch N Zaphris P British HCI Conference: HCI and the Older Population 2015-09-15 Learning from people with dementia to develop research methods for older people http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/utopia/workshop/savitch.pdf
  3. [64]Lorig Kate R Ritter Philip L Dost Ayesha Plant Kathryn Laurent Diana D McNeil Ian The Expert Patients Programme online, a 1-year study of an Internet-based self-management programme for people with long-term conditions Chronic Illn 2008 12 4 4 247 56 10.1177/1742395308098886 19091933 4/4/247 19091933 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [72]Coulehan M Impact of a Web-based educational and peer-support intervention for dementia caregivers 2011 4 27 Aging in America Conference 2011 Apr 27 San Francisco, CA Washington, DC American Society on Aging

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boots, L. M., de Vugt, M. E., Withagen, H. E., Kempen, G. I., & Verhey, F. R.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Venue
JMIR Research Protocols
Published
2016-03-01
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
e33
ISSN
1929-0748 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2291305067
Cited by
79
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5
FWCI
7.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Research Protocols (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
early-stage dementia, family caregivers, caregiver self-efficacy, goal achievement, feasibility, usability testing, user needs, complex intervention development, informal care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review