The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validation of the Perceived Stress Scale in a community sample of older adults
Open accessAbstract
Background: Three versions of Perceived Stress Scale (PSS‐14, PSS‐10, and PSS‐4) are among the most widely used measures of stress. The aim of the current study was to validate this instrument in a sample of nondemented older adults to facilitate studies of the impact of stress on health. Methods: Seven hundred sixty‐eight nondemented adults over the age of 70 years completed the PSS‐14 questionnaire and other neuropsychological tests. Exploratory factor analysis was used to determine the underlying factor structure of all PSS versions, and confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the construct validity of factors. The internal consistency reliability of the scales was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, and concurrent validity was evaluated by examining PSS relation with age, gender, depression, anxiety, and Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule. Results: A two‐factor model was the optimal fit for the 14‐item and 10‐item versions of PSS. For PSS‐14, all items' loadings exceeded 0.4 for one of the two factors except item 12. Therefore, we studied a 13‐item version of PSS and 10‐item and 4‐item subsets representing PSS‐10 and PSS‐4. Internal consistency coefficients were satisfactory for the full scale of PSS‐13 and PSS‐10 but not for PSS‐4. Women reported higher levels of stress than men. Higher levels of total PSS scores showed association with higher levels of depression, anxiety, and negative affect, and lower level of positive affect. Conclusions: The 13‐item and 10‐item versions of PSS may be used to understand the experience of stress among older adults. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Global Measure of Perceived Stress
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136404 · Cited by 32,807
An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties.
Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. A. (1988) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.56.6.893 · Cited by 14,407
Fiske, A., Wetherell, J. L., & Gatz, M. (2009) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153621 · Cited by 2,353
Psychometric Properties of a European Spanish Version of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
Remor, E. (2006) · The Spanish Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1017/s1138741600006004 · Cited by 1,003
Further psychometric support for the 10-item version of the Perceived Stress Scale
Roberti, J. W., Harrington, L. N., & Storch, E. A. (2006) · Journal of College Counseling · doi:10.1002/j.2161-1882.2006.tb00100.x · Cited by 984 · cited 1×
“…SD= 1.22; Martin et al., 1995), women recovering from breast cancer (mean age of 51 years, SD= 10; Golden-Kreutz et al., 2004), college students (Roberti et al., 2006), and adults who had survived the death of a family member or significant other by suicide (mean age of 43.3 years, SD= 13.7;…”
BackgroundInfluentialPerceived Stress Scale: Reliability and Validity Study in Brazil
Siqueira Reis, R., Ferreira Hino, A. A., & Romélio Rodriguez Añez, C. (2010) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105309346343 · Cited by 698
Perceived Stress Scale: Reliability and Validity Study in Greece
Andreou, E., Alexopoulos, E. C., Lionis, C., Varvogli, L., Gnardellis, C., Chrousos, G. P., & Darviri, C. (2011) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph8083287 · Cited by 641
Leung, D. Y., Lam, T.-H., & Chan, S. S. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-513 · Cited by 562
Perceived stress in survivors of suicide: psychometric properties of the Perceived Stress Scale.
Mitchell, A. M., Crane, P. A., & Kim, Y. (2008) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.20284 · Cited by 283 · cited 2×
“…et al., 1995), women recovering from breast cancer (mean age of 51 years, SD= 10; Golden-Kreutz et al., 2004), college students (Roberti et al., 2006), and adults who had survived the death of a family member or significant other by suicide (mean age of 43.3 years, SD= 13.7; Mitchell et al., 2008).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialPerceived Stress and Salivary Cortisol in Daily Life
van Eck, M. M., & Nicolson, N. A. (1994) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/abm/16.3.221 · Cited by 113
Personality disorders and perceived stress in major depressive disorder.
Candrian, M., Schwartz, F., Farabaugh, A., Perlis, R. H., Ehlert, U., & Fava, M. (2008) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2007.06.014 · Cited by 37
Cited by
Psychometric properties of the perceived stress scale in a community sample of Chinese
Huang, F., Wang, H., Wang, Z., Zhang, J., Du, W., Su, C., Jia, X., Ouyang, Y., Wang, Y., Li, L., et al. (2020) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-020-02520-4 · Cited by 209
McKean, J., Naug, H., Nikbakht, E., Amiet, B., & Colson, N. (2017) · The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine · doi:10.1089/acm.2016.0023 · Cited by 125
Parks, A. C., Williams, A. L., Tugade, M. M., Hokes, K. E., Honomichl, R. D., & Zilca, R. D. (2018) · International Journal of Wellbeing · doi:10.5502/ijw.v8i2.745 · Cited by 87
Shields, G. S., Doty, D., Shields, R. H., Gower, G., Slavich, G. M., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2017) · Stress · doi:10.1080/10253890.2017.1380620 · Cited by 71
Nathan, H. J., Poulin, P., Wozny, D., Taljaard, M., Smyth, C., Gilron, I., Sorisky, A., Lochnan, H., & Shergill, Y. (2017) · Clinical Diabetes · doi:10.2337/cd17-0077 · Cited by 61
“Secondary outcomes included: • IMMPACT-recommended mea- sures (16,17), including the BPI for pain severity, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9) (19) for depression, the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) (20) for QoL, the Profile of Mood States-2A (POMS-2A) for total mood disturbance (reported here), and…”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Ezzati, A., Jiang, J., Katz, M. J., Sliwinski, M. J., Zimmerman, M. E., & Lipton, R. B.
- Venue
- International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-12-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 645-652
- ISSN
- 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1166
- OpenAlex
- W1958379038
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 13.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
