Cited by 71Stress Responses and CortisolMemory Processes and InfluencesIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recent life stress exposure is associated with poorer long-term memory, working memory, and self-reported memory

Open access

Abstract

Although substantial research has examined the effects of stress on cognition, much of this research has focused on acute stress (e.g. manipulated in the laboratory) or chronic stress (e.g. persistent interpersonal or financial difficulties). In contrast, the effects of recent life stress on cognition have been relatively understudied. To address this issue, we examined how recent life stress is associated with long-term, working memory, and self-reported memory in a sample of 142 healthy young adults who were assessed at two time points over a two-week period. Recent life stress was measured using the newly-developed Stress and Adversity Inventory for Daily Stress (Daily STRAIN), which assesses the frequency of relatively common stressful life events and difficulties over the preceding two weeks. To assess memory performance, participants completed both long-term and working memory tasks. Participants also provided self-reports of memory problems. As hypothesized, greater recent life stress exposure was associated with worse performance on measures of long-term and working memory, as well as more self-reported memory problems. These associations were largely robust while controlling for possible confounds, including participants' age, sex, and negative affect. The findings indicate that recent life stress exposure is broadly associated with worse memory. Future studies should thus consider assessing recent life stress as a potential predictor, moderator, or covariate of memory performance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10253890.2017.1380620

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cumulative life stress measured with the STRAIN has been associated with worse health, including poor self-reported physical health, impaired cognitive functioning, and greater cancer-related depression and fatigue.

    “Cumulative life stress measured with the STRAIN has so far been associated with worse health, including poor self-reported physical health (Toussaint et al., 2016), impaired cognitive functioning (Goldfarb et al., 2017; Shields et al., 2017), and greater cancer-related depression and fatigue (Bower et al., 2014; Dooley et al., 2017).”

    From More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science (2018) · cites this paper as Shields et al., 2017

    Shields et al. support the cognitive-functioning part: the Discussion reports that greater recent life stress was associated with worse working and long-term memory. But the Methods specify that this study used the Daily STRAIN to measure stress over two weeks, not the original STRAIN measure of cumulative lifetime stress. The physical-health and cancer-related outcomes have other citations in the citing sentence and are not attributed to Shields et al. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1037//0278-6133.21.6.531 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shields, G. S., Doty, D., Shields, R. H., Gower, G., Slavich, G. M., & Yonelinas, A. P.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • University of Idaho (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Shields, Grant S.
Venue
Stress
Published
2017-10-12
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
598-607
ISSN
  • 1025-3890 (ISSN-L)
  • 1607-8888
OpenAlex
W2761548182
Cited by
71
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 5
FWCI
4.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Stress (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Eye Institute (EY025999)
  • NARSAD (23958)
  • Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (K08 MH103443)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
daily stress, long-term memory, working memory, stress and cognition, young adults, negative affect
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Memory Disorders, Memory, Short-Term, Mental Recall, Stress, Psychological, Task Performance and Analysis, Young Adult, Self Report, Memory, Long-Term

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review