Cited by 486Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismFree Will and Agency

Common and unique components of response inhibition revealed by fMRI

Wager, Tor D., Sylvester, Ching-Yune C., Lacey, Steven C., Nee, Derek Evan, Franklin, Michael, Jonides, John·2005·NeuroImage

Abstract

The ability to inhibit inappropriate responses is central to cognitive control, but whether the same brain mechanisms mediate inhibition across different tasks is not known. We present evidence for a common set of frontal and parietal regions engaged in response inhibition across three tasks: a go/no-go task, a flanker task, and a stimulus-response compatibility task. Regions included bilateral anterior insula/frontal operculum and anterior prefrontal, right dorsolateral and premotor, and parietal cortices. Insula activity was positively correlated with interference costs in behavioral performance in each task. Principal components analysis showed a coherent pattern of individual differences in these regions that was also positively correlated with performance in all three tasks. However, correlations among tasks were low, for both brain activity and performance. We suggest that common interference detection and/or resolution mechanisms are engaged across tasks, and that inter-task correlations in behavioral performance are low because they conflate measurements of common mechanisms with measurements of individual biases unique to each task.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.054

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Interference inhibition, action restraint, and action cancelation are all associated with activation of the IFG, anterior insula, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), pre-SMA, and parietal regions.

    “Interference inhibition, action restraint and action cancelation are all associated with activation of the IFG, anterior insula, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), pre-SMA, and parietal regions (Wager et al., 2005; Nee et al., 2007; Sebastian et al., 2013b).”
  • Previous research has demonstrated a linear relationship between neural activity of the anterior insula and task performance across three response inhibition tasks (Flanker, Go/NoGo etc.).

    “The previous research has demonstrated a linear relationship between the neural activity of the anterior insula and task performance across three response inhibition tasks (Flanker, Go/NoGo etc.) (Wager et al. 2005), which were included in the current meta-analysis.”
  • Activation in right inferior parietal regions has been a very consistent finding across fMRI studies of response inhibition.

    “activation in right inferior parietal regions has been a very consistent finding across fMRI studies of response inhibition”
  • Recruitment of the RIFC is not a universal finding; many fMRI and lesion studies of response inhibition fail to report involvement of this region.

    “Recruitment of the RIFC is not a universal finding, with many fMRI and lesion studies of response inhibition failing to report involvement of this region”
  • The DLS and DMS differ in their contribution to the inhibition of competing, but incorrect responses.

    “The DLS and DMS also appear to differ in their contribution to the inhibition of competing, but incorrect responses”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wager, T. D., Sylvester, C.-Y. C., Lacey, S. C., Nee, D. E., Franklin, M., & Jonides, J.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Wager, Tor D.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-08
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
323-340
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148002450
Cited by
486
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 32
FWCI
10.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
Keywords
response inhibition, cognitive control, go/no-go task, flanker task, stimulus-response compatibility, anterior insula, frontal operculum, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, premotor cortex, parietal cortex, individual differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Individuality, Inhibition, Psychological, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Reading, Saccades

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review