Cited by 216Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchSchizophrenia research and treatment

Childhood psychiatric disorders as anomalies in neurodevelopmental trajectories

Open access
Shaw, Philip, Gogtay, Nitin, Rapoport, Judith·2010·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Childhood psychiatric disorders are rarely static; rather they change over time and longitudinal studies are ideally suited to capture such dynamic processes. Using longitudinal data, insights can be gained into the nature of the perturbation away from the trajectory of typical development in childhood disorders. Thus, some disorders may reflect a delay in neurodevelopmental trajectories. Our studies in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) suggest that cortical development is delayed with a rightward shift along the age axis in cortical trajectories, most prominent in prefrontal cortical regions. Other disorders may be characterized by differences in the velocity of trajectories: the basic shape of neurodevelopmental curves remains intact, but with disrupted tempo. Thus, childhood onset schizophrenia is associated with a marked increase during adolescence in the velocity of loss of cerebral gray matter. By contrast, in childhood autism there is an early acceleration of brain growth, which overshoots typical dimensions leading to transient cerebral enlargement. Finally, there may be more profound deviations from typical neurodevelopment, with a complete "derailing" of brain growth and a loss of the features which characterize typical brain development. An example is the almost complete silencing of white matter growth during adolescence of patients with childhood onset schizophrenia. Adopting a longitudinal perspective also readily lends itself to the understanding of the neural bases of differential clinical outcomes. Again taking ADHD as an example, we found that remission is associated with convergence to the template of typical development, whereas persistence is accompanied by progressive divergence away from typical trajectories.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.21028

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent review suggests that remission in ADHD with age may be linked to normalization of initial delays or deficits in brain networks, whereas persistence into adolescence may be associated with a lack of normalization and perhaps a more deviant trajectory of brain growth.

    “A recent review focusing on trajectories of brain development (Shaw, Gogtay, & Rapoport, 2010) suggests that remission in ADHD with age may be linked to a normalization of initial delays or deficits in brain networks, whereas ADHD persistence into adolescence may be associated with a lack of normalization and perhaps a more deviant trajectory of brain growth.”
  • The group treated consistently with stimulant medication appeared to show normalization in the trajectory of brain development, but this group was self-selected and may differ on other factors related to outcome.

    “Surprisingly, the group that had been treated consistently with stimulant medication appeared to show normalization in the trajectory of brain development (for a review see Shaw et al (2010)), but this group was self-selected and may differ on other factors related to outcome.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Diggle PJ, Liang KY, Zeger SL (1994): Analysis of Longitudinal Data. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Semrud-Clikeman M, Pliszka SR, Lancaster J, Liotti M (2006): Volumetric MRI differences in treatment-naive vs chronically treated children with ADHD [erratum appears in Neurology. 2006 Dec 12;67:2091]. Neurology 67:1023-1027.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shaw, P., Gogtay, N., & Rapoport, J.
Affiliations
National Institute of Mental Health (US)
Corresponding author
Shaw, Philip
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-05-14
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
917-925
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2095832213
Cited by
216
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 21
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
child psychopathology, neurodevelopmental trajectories, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, childhood schizophrenia, autism spectrum disorder, cortical development, prefrontal cortex, gray matter loss, white matter development, longitudinal brain development, remission
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Mental Disorders, Brain, Child, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review