Cited by 415Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesElectroconvulsive Therapy StudiesNeurological disorders and treatments

Therapeutic effects of non-invasive brain stimulation with direct currents (tDCS) in neuropsychiatric diseases

Kuo, Min-Fang, Paulus, Walter, Nitsche, Michael A.·2014·NeuroImage

Abstract

Neuroplasticity, which is the dynamic structural and functional reorganization of central nervous system connectivity due to environmental and internal demands, is recognized as a major physiological basis for adaption of cognition, and behavior, and thus of utmost importance for normal brain function. Pathological alterations of plasticity are increasingly explored as pathophysiological foundation of diverse neurological and psychiatric diseases. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques (NIBS), such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), are able to induce and modulate neuroplasticity in humans. Therefore, they have potential to alter pathological plasticity on the one hand, and foster physiological plasticity on the other, in neuropsychiatric diseases to reduce symptoms, and enhance rehabilitation. tDCS is an emerging NIBS tool, which induces glutamatergic plasticity via application of relatively weak currents through the scalp in humans. In the last years its efficacy to treat neuropsychiatric diseases has been explored increasingly. In this review, we will give an overview of pathological alterations of plasticity in neuropsychiatric diseases, gather clinical studies involving tDCS to ameliorate symptoms, and discuss future directions of application, with an emphasis on optimizing stimulation effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.117

Cites

147 of 147 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 149 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuo, M.-F., Paulus, W., & Nitsche, M. A.
Affiliations
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Nitsche, Michael A.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
85
Pages
948-960
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2057070604
Cited by
415
References
149
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 13
FWCI
4.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • GRO (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • German Research Society (Ni 683/4-2, Ni 683/6-1)
  • German Ministry for Education and Research (03IPT605E)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
transcranial direct current stimulation, non-invasive brain stimulation, neuroplasticity, neuropsychiatric disorders, stimulation optimization
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Humans, Neuronal Plasticity, Tinnitus, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review