Cited by 42Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Altered salience processing in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Open access
Tegelbeckers, Jana, Bunzeck, Nico, Duzel, Emrah, Bonath, Björn, Flechtner, Hans‐Henning, Krauel, Kerstin·2015·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Attentional problems in patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have often been linked with deficits in cognitive control. Whether these deficits are associated with increased sensitivity to external salient stimuli remains unclear. To address this issue, we acquired functional brain images (fMRI) in 38 boys with and without ADHD (age: 11-16 years). To differentiate the effects of item novelty, contextual rareness and task relevance, participants performed a visual oddball task including four stimulus categories: a frequent standard picture (62.5%), unique novel pictures (12.5%), one repeated rare picture (12.5%), and a target picture (12.5%) that required a specific motor response. As a main finding, we can show considerable overlap in novelty-related BOLD responses between both groups, but only healthy participants showed neural deactivation in temporal as well as frontal regions in response to novel pictures. Furthermore, only ADHD patients, but not healthy controls, engaged wide parts of the novelty network when processing the rare but familiar picture. Our results provide first evidence that ADHD patients show enhanced neural activity in response to novel but behaviorally irrelevant stimuli as well as reduced habituation to familiar items. These findings suggest an inefficient use of neuronal resources in children with ADHD that could be closely linked to increased distractibility.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.22755

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In ADHD, irrelevant environmental cues are assigned exaggerated stimulus salience.

    “irrelevant environmental cues are assigned exaggerated stimulus salience (Tegelbeckers et al., 2015).”

    From Ventral striatum dopamine release encodes unique properties of visual stimuli in mice (2023) · cites this paper as Tegelbeckers et al., 2015

    The Abstract and Discussion > Novelty (page unavailable) report greater neural activity and allocation of neural resources to novel, behaviorally irrelevant pictures in boys with ADHD. They do not establish that irrelevant environmental cues generally are assigned exaggerated salience; that wording extends a finding about particular visual stimuli to a broader mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tegelbeckers, J., Bunzeck, N., Duzel, E., Bonath, B., Flechtner, H., & Krauel, K.
Affiliations
  • Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
  • Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London London United Kingdom
  • Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences (DE)
Corresponding author
Tegelbeckers, Jana
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-02-03
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
2049-2060
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W1576842677
Cited by
42
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • DZNE Pub (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Sonderforschungsbereich 779, TP A03)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, salience processing, novelty processing, visual oddball task, habituation, distractibility, cognitive control, neural deactivation, children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Child, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen, Psychomotor Performance, Visual Perception, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review