Cited by 180Action Observation and SynchronizationNeuroscience, Education and Cognitive FunctionNeural dynamics and brain function

Enhancement of teaching outcome through neural prediction of the students' knowledge state

Open access
Zheng, Lifen, Chen, Chuansheng, Liu, Wenda, Long, Yuhang, Zhao, Hui, Bai, Xialu, Zhang, Zhanjun, Han, Zaizhu +5 more·2018·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

The neural mechanism for the dyadic process of teaching is poorly understood. Although theories about teaching have proposed that before any teaching takes place, the teacher will predict the knowledge state of the student(s) to enhance the teaching outcome, this theoretical Prediction‐Transmission hypothesis has not been tested with any neuroimaging studies. Using functional near‐infrared spectroscopy‐based hyperscanning, this study measured brain activities of the teacher–student pairs simultaneously. Results showed that better teaching outcome was associated with higher time‐lagged interpersonal neural synchronization (INS) between right temporal‐parietal junction (TPJ) of the teacher and anterior superior temporal cortex (aSTC) of the student, when the teacher's brain activity preceded that of the student. Moreover, time course analyses suggested that such INS could mark the quality of the teaching outcome at an early stage of the teaching process. These results provided key neural evidence for the Prediction‐Transmission hypothesis about teaching, and suggested that the INS plays an important role in the successful teaching.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.24059

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Torrence, C., & Compo, G. P. (1998). A practical guide to wavelet analy- sis. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 79(1), 61-78.
  2. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  3. Wu, S. (2013). The special teaching materials of quantity relations in the 2014 national civil service examinations, the administrative professional ability test. China University of Politic Science and Law Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zheng, L., Chen, C., Liu, W., Long, Y., Zhao, H., Bai, X., Zhang, Z., Han, Z., Liu, L., Guo, T., Chen, B., Ding, G., & Lu, C.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Normal University (CN)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning Beijing Normal University Beijing 100875 China
Corresponding author
Lu, Chunming
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-03-25
Volume
39
Issue
7
Pages
3046-3057
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2794239546
Cited by
180
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4
FWCI
16.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (31622030, 31411130158)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
teaching, student knowledge state, interpersonal neural synchronization, teacher-student relationship, temporoparietal junction, hyperscanning, functional near-infrared spectroscopy
MeSH terms
Educational Personnel, Adult, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Problem Solving, Students, Teaching, Time Factors, Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared, Mathematical Concepts, Young Adult, Functional Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review