Cited by 172Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesOrgan Transplantation Techniques and OutcomesLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment

Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing simultaneous liver transplantation and sleeve gastrectomy

Zamora‐Valdes, Daniel, Watt, Kymberly D., Kellogg, Todd A., Poterucha, John J., Di Cecco, Sara R., Francisco‐Ziller, Nicki M., Taner, Timucin, Rosen, Charles B. +1 more·2018·Hepatology

Abstract

were enrolled. Patients who achieved weight loss (BMI <35) underwent LT alone, and those who did not underwent simultaneous LT + SG. Analysis of long-term outcomes for patients ≥3 years posttransplant was performed. Since 2006, there were 36 in the weight loss intervention (LT cohort) and 13 in the LT + SG cohort with >3 years of follow-up, whereas overall, a total of 29 patients underwent LT + SG. Patients in the LT cohort had less severe obesity at enrollment (40.0 ± 2.7 vs. LT + SG cohort 46.0 ± 4.5; P < 0.001). In the LT cohort, 83.3% (30 of 36) achieved >10% loss in total body weight (TBW) pre-LT. Three years posttransplant, 29.4% of patients in the LT cohort maintained >10% loss in TBW, whereas 100% of the LT + SG patients did (P < 0.001). Patients who underwent LT + SG maintained a significantly higher percentage of total body weight loss after 3 years of follow-up (LT cohort 3.9 ± 13.3% vs. LT + S G cohort 34.8 ± 17.3%; P < 0.001). Patients in the LT + SG also had a lower prevalence of hypertension, insulin resistance, and hepatic steatosis and required fewer antihypertensive medications and lipid agents at last follow-up. CONCLUSION: Whereas weight loss before transplantation was achieved by obese patients, weight regain was common in the LT cohort. Combined LT + SG resulted in more effective and more durable weight loss, as well as fewer metabolic complications at last follow-up. (Hepatology 2018).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.29848

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zamora‐Valdes, D., Watt, K. D., Kellogg, T. A., Poterucha, J. J., Di Cecco, S. R., Francisco‐Ziller, N. M., Taner, T., Rosen, C. B., & Heimbach, J. K.
Affiliations
  • Transplant Surgery,Mayo Clinic,Rochester,MN
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Liver Transplant,Mayo Clinic,Rochester,MN
Corresponding author
Heimbach, Julie K.
Venue
Hepatology
Published
2018-05-14
Volume
68
Issue
2
Pages
485-495
ISSN
  • 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3350
OpenAlex
W2791682598
Cited by
172
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8
FWCI
16.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
liver transplantation, sleeve gastrectomy, obesity, weight loss, weight regain, metabolic complications, insulin resistance, hypertension, hepatic steatosis, antihypertensive drugs, lipid-lowering drugs
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Body Weight, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gastrectomy, Humans, Liver Diseases, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Quality of Life, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Survival Rate, Liver Transplantation, Treatment Outcome, Weight Reduction Programs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review