Cited by 141Liver physiology and pathologyTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine3D Printing in Biomedical Research

Large‐Scale Production of LGR5‐Positive Bipotential Human Liver Stem Cells

Open access
Schneeberger, Kerstin, Sánchez‐Romero, Natalia, Ye, Shicheng, van Steenbeek, Frank G., Oosterhoff, Loes A., Pla Palacin, Iris, Chen, Chen, van Wolferen, Monique E. +13 more·2020·Hepatology

Abstract

Background and Aims: The gap between patients on transplant waiting lists and available donor organs is steadily increasing. Human organoids derived from leucine‐rich repeat‐containing G protein‐coupled receptor 5 (LGR5)–positive adult stem cells represent an exciting new cell source for liver regeneration; however, culturing large numbers of organoids with current protocols is tedious and the level of hepatic differentiation is limited. Approach and Results: Here, we established a method for the expansion of large quantities of human liver organoids in spinner flasks. Due to improved oxygenation in the spinner flasks, organoids rapidly proliferated and reached an average 40‐fold cell expansion after 2 weeks, compared with 6‐fold expansion in static cultures. The organoids repopulated decellularized liver discs and formed liver‐like tissue. After differentiation in spinner flasks, mature hepatocyte markers were highly up‐regulated compared with static organoid cultures, and cytochrome p450 activity reached levels equivalent to hepatocytes. Conclusions: We established a highly efficient method for culturing large numbers of LGR5‐positive stem cells in the form of organoids, which paves the way for the application of organoids for tissue engineering and liver transplantation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.31037

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Liver organoids derived from LGR5-positive liver progenitor cells can be stably maintained for months and can differentiate into functionally competent hepatocytes and cholangiocytes.

    “Liver organoids derived from leucine-rich repeat–containing G protein–coupled receptor 5 (LGR5)–positive liver progenitor cells (LPC) can be stably maintained for months and can differentiate into functionally competent hepatocytes and cholangiocytes [14–16].”

    From High-throughput human microfluidic organoid-on-a-chip platform for modeling liver diseases and screening nanotherapeutics. (2026) · cites this paper as [15]

    The introductory passage says LGR5-positive liver organoids can be expanded for years, while the Discussion reports that this paper's spinner-flask organoids were maintained for at least six weeks. The Results show differentiation toward cholangiocyte-like and hepatocyte-like cells and assays of hepatocyte function, but not functional competence of cholangiocytes. The Discussion also cautions that the hepatocyte-like cells did not reach a fully mature phenotype. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schneeberger, K., Sánchez‐Romero, N., Ye, S., van Steenbeek, F. G., Oosterhoff, L. A., Pla Palacin, I., Chen, C., van Wolferen, M. E., van Tienderen, G., Lieshout, R., Colemonts‐Vroninks, H., Schene, I., Hoekstra, R., Verstegen, M. M. A., van der Laan, L. J. W., Penning, L. C., Fuchs, S. A., Clevers, H., De Kock, J., Baptista, P. M., & Spee, B.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón (ES)
  • Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals,Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,Utrecht University,Utrecht,the Netherlands
  • Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón (IIS Aragón),Zaragoza,Spain
  • Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (NL)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Department of Surgery,Erasmus MC‐University Medical Center,Rotterdam,the Netherlands
  • Department of In Vitro Toxicology and Dermato‐cosmetology,Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy,Vrije Universiteit Brussel,Brussels,Belgium
  • Fundacion Agencia Aragonesa para la Investigacion y el Desarrollo (ES)
Corresponding author
Schneeberger, Kerstin
Venue
Hepatology
Published
2020-04-08
Volume
72
Issue
1
Pages
257-270
ISSN
  • 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3350
OpenAlex
W2988904063
Cited by
141
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 10
FWCI
10.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hepatology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • KNAW research portal (Royal Academy of Art and Sciences (KNAW)) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • e-Archivo (Carlos III University of Madrid) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zaguan (University of Zaragoza Repository) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (HORIZON2020, 874586)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (016.Veni.198.021, 15498, 116004121)
  • China Scholarship Council (CSC201306310019, CSC201808310180)
  • Stichting voor de Technische Wetenschappen (15498)
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI15/00563, PI18/00529)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Keywords
human liver organoids, spinner flask culture, organoid expansion, hepatocyte differentiation, cytochrome P450 activity, liver regeneration, liver transplantation, tissue engineering
MeSH terms
Cell Differentiation, Cells, Cultured, Humans, Liver Regeneration, Organoids, Stem Cells, Liver Transplantation, Cell Culture Techniques, Hepatocytes, Tissue Engineering, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, Cell Proliferation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review