Cited by 34Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory Processes and Influences

The maintenance of long‐term memory in the hippocampus depends on the interaction between N‐ethylmaleimide‐sensitive factor and GluA2

Migues, Paola Virginia, Hardt, Oliver, Finnie, Peter, Wang, Yu Wang, Nader, Karim·2014·Hippocampus

Abstract

The maintenance of established memories has recently been shown to involve the stabilization of GluA2-containing AMPA receptors (GluA2/AMPARs) at postsynaptic membranes. Previous studies have suggested that N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor (NSF) regulates the stabilization of AMPARs at the synaptic membrane. We therefore disrupted the interaction between GluA2 and NSF in the dorsal hippocampus and examined its effect on the maintenance of object location and contextual fear memory. We used two interference peptides, pep2m and pepR845A, that have been shown to block the binding of NSF to GluA2 and reduce GluA2 synaptic content. Either peptide disrupted consolidated memory, and these effects persisted for at least 5 or 28 days after peptide administration. Following peptide administration and long-term memory disruption, rats were able to acquire new memories. Memory acquisition or consolidation was not impaired when pepR845A was given immediately before the training sessions. Blocking GluA2 endocytosis with the peptide GluA23Y prevented the memory impairment effect of pepR845A. Taken together, our results indicate that the persistence of long-term memory depends on the maintenance of a steady-state level of synaptic GluA2/AMPARs, which requires the interaction of NSF with GluA2.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hipo.22295

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Migues, P. V., Hardt, O., Finnie, P., Wang, Y. W., & Nader, K.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Department of Medicine Brain Research Center, University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada
Corresponding author
Migues, Paola Virginia
Venue
Hippocampus
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-05-02
Volume
24
Issue
9
Pages
1112-1119
ISSN
  • 1050-9631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1063
OpenAlex
W1900605886
Cited by
33
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hippocampus (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP-123430)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor, NSF, GluA2, AMPA receptors, memory consolidation, object location memory, contextual fear memory, dorsal hippocampus
MeSH terms
Animals, Endocytosis, Fear, Hippocampus, Learning, Neuropsychological Tests, Oligopeptides, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Receptors, AMPA, Nootropic Agents, Rats, Long-Evans, Recognition, Psychology, N-Ethylmaleimide-Sensitive Proteins, Memory, Long-Term, Spatial Memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review