CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 362Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and Memory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Severity of memory impairment in monkeys as a function of locus and extent of damage within the medial temporal lobe memory system

Zola‐Morgan, Stuart, Squire, Larry R., Ramus, Seth J.·1994·Hippocampus
DOI 10.1002/hipo.450040410
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

During the past decade, work with monkeys has helped identify the structures in the medial temporal lobe that are important for memory: the hippocampal region (including the hippocampus proper, the dentate gyrus, and the subicular complex) and adjacent cortical areas that are anatomically linked to the hippocampus, i.e., the entorhinal, perirhinal, and parahippocampal cortices. One idea that has emerged from this work is that the severity of memory impairment might increase as more components of the medial temporal lobe are damaged. We have evaluated this idea directly by examining behavioral data from 30 monkeys (ten normal monkeys and 20 monkeys with bilateral lesions involving structures within the medial temporal lobe) that have completed testing on our standard memory battery during the last 10 years. The main finding was that the severity of memory impairment depended on the locus and extent of damage to the medial temporal lobe. Specifically, damage limited to the hippocampal region produced a mild memory impairment. More severe memory impairment was produced when the damage was increased to include the adjacent entorhinal and parahippocampal cortices (the H+ lesion). Finally, memory impairment was even more severe when the H+ lesion was extended forward to include the anterior entorhinal cortex and the perirhinal cortex (H++ lesion). Taken together, these findings suggest that, whereas damage to the hippocampal region produces measurable memory impairment, a substantial part of the severe memory impairment produced by large medial temporal lobe lesions in humans and monkeys can be attributed to damage to entorhinal, perirhinal, and parahippocampal cortices adjacent to the hippocampal region. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hipo.450040410

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 60 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Clower RP, 1991, Recognition memory impairment in monkeys with selective hippocampal lesions, Soc Neurosci Abstr, 17, 338
  2. 10.1037/0735-7044.98.5.759 · DOI
  3. Mumby DG, 1992, Dissociating the effects of hippocampal and amygdalar lesions in rats with a battery of nonspatial memory tasks, Soc Neurosci Abstr, 18, 1423
  4. Rothblatt LA, 1991, Effects of entorhinal lesions on tests of spatial and nonspatial memory in the rat, Soc Neurosci Abstr, 17, 131
  5. Wang J, 1990, Effects of neostriatal lesions on visual habit formation in rhesus monkeys, Soc Neurosci Abstr, 16, 617
  6. Zola‐Morgan S, 1990, The development of memory, 434

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Zola‐Morgan, S., Squire, L. R., & Ramus, S. J.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
ORCID
Squire, Larry R.
Venue
Hippocampus
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-08
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
483-495
ISSN
  • 1050-9631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1063
DOI
10.1002/hipo.450040410
OpenAlex
W2100224172
Semantic Scholar
7707a32abffc33a1ad4c50e95c0cf81bd432b556
Cited by
362
References
60
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
14.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 3726 d)
Locations
  • Hippocampus (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ns019063-12)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS19063)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
memory impairment, medial temporal lobe, entorhinal cortex, perirhinal cortex, parahippocampal cortex, dentate gyrus, bilateral lesions, lesion extent, memory systems, monkeys
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Macaca fascicularis, Male, Memory, Memory Disorders, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Temporal Lobe, Entorhinal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review