Cited by 347Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

A computational theory of hippocampal function, and tests of the theory: New developments

Kesner, Raymond P., Rolls, Edmund T.·2015·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

The aims of the paper are to update Rolls' quantitative computational theory of hippocampal function and the predictions it makes about the different subregions (dentate gyrus, CA3 and CA1), and to examine behavioral and electrophysiological data that address the functions of the hippocampus and particularly its subregions. Based on the computational proposal that the dentate gyrus produces sparse representations by competitive learning and via the mossy fiber pathway forces new representations on the CA3 during learning (encoding), it has been shown behaviorally that the dentate gyrus supports spatial pattern separation during learning. Based on the computational proposal that CA3-CA3 autoassociative networks are important for episodic memory, it has been shown behaviorally that the CA3 supports spatial rapid one-trial learning, learning of arbitrary associations where space is a component, pattern completion, spatial short-term memory, and spatial sequence learning by associations formed between successive items. The concept that the CA1 recodes information from CA3 and sets up associatively learned backprojections to neocortex to allow subsequent retrieval of information to neocortex, is consistent with findings on consolidation. Behaviorally, the CA1 is implicated in processing temporal information as shown by investigations requiring temporal order pattern separation and associations across time; and computationally this could involve associations in CA1 between object and timing information that have their origins in the lateral and medial entorhinal cortex respectively. The perforant path input from the entorhinal cortex to DG is implicated in learning, to CA3 in retrieval from CA3, and to CA1 in retrieval after longer time intervals ("intermediate-term memory") and in the temporal sequence memory for objects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.11.009

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This feature seems to depend on a pattern completion mechanism that is able to reinstate complete memories after partial cueing, based on the operation of hippocampal autoassociative neural networks.

    “This feature seems to depend on a pattern completion mechanism that is able to reinstate complete memories after partial cueing, based on the operation of hippocampal autoassociative neural networks”

    From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [79]

  • According to mechanistic models of hippocampal memory function, the hippocampal neural network can shift between encoding and retrieval modes depending on the novelty degree of incoming spatial information.

    “Thus, according to the mechanistic models of hippocampal memory function, the hippocampal neural network can shift between two functional modes, encoding and retrieval, depending on the novelty degree of the incoming spatial information [77,78,79].”

    From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [79]

  • In mammals, similar spatial behavior capabilities likely depend on dentate gyrus to CA3 projections operating as a sparse coding device that performs pattern separation during initial encoding and memory storage.

    “It has been proposed [79,80,190,206,207] that similar spatial behavior capabilities likely depend, in mammals, on two hypothetical hippocampal mechanisms: first, the projections from the dentate gyrus to the CA3 area of the hippocampus seem to operate as a sparse coding device that orthogonalizes and disambiguates similar inputs patterns, performing pattern separation during initial encoding and”

    From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [79]

  • In mammals, allocentric navigation involves an extended cortico-hippocampal network that conveys highly processed visual and multisensory information to hippocampal circuits for transformation into 'world-centered' relational spatial representations.

    “In mammals, allocentric navigation is thought to involve the operation of an extended cortico-hippocampal network that conveys highly processed visual and multisensory information to the hippocampal circuits for further processing and transformation into “world-centered” relational spatial representations [74,76,79,188,189,190,191,192].”

    From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [79]

  • In mammals, similar spatial behavior capabilities likely depend on the extensive recurrent-collateral network of CA3 neurons operating as an autoassociative network that stores arbitrary associations between stimuli and functions as a pattern completion mechanism.

    “second, the extensive recurrent-collateral network of the CA3 neurons operates as an autoassociative network that allows the storage of arbitrary associations between stimuli, and that functions as a pattern completion mechanism that reinstates the complete memories in response to incomplete input patterns.”

    From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [79]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kesner, R. P., & Rolls, E. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
Corresponding author
Rolls, Edmund T.
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
48
Pages
92-147
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2028346421
Cited by
347
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • Human Frontier Science
  • EEC BRAIN
  • MRC Oxford Interdisciplinary Research Centre in Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Oxford McDonnell-Pew Centre in Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Oxford Centre for Computational Neuroscience
  • NSF (IBN-0135273)
  • NIH (5R01MH065314-02)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
hippocampal function, roll, dentate gyrus, CA3, CA1, sparse representation, competitive learning, mossy fiber pathway, pattern separation, pattern completion, episodic memory, autoassociative networks, spatial learning, one-trial learning, spatial short-term memory, sequence learning, memory consolidation, temporal order, entorhinal cortex, perforant path, intermediate-term memory, temporal sequence memory, memory retrieval
MeSH terms
Animals, Computer Simulation, Hippocampus, Humans, Memory, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Space Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review