Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 46

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Caffeine and stress alter salivary α‐amylase activity in young men

Klein, Laura C., Bennett, Jeanette M., Whetzel, Courtney A., Granger, Douglas A., Ritter, Frank E.·2010·Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental

Abstract

Objective: We examined the effects of caffeine and a psychological stressor on salivary α‐amylase (sAA) in healthy young males (age 18–30 years) who consumed caffeine on a daily basis. Methods: Using a between‐subjects, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled design, 45 participants received either 200 or 400 mg of caffeine (Vivarin®) or placebo, rested for 20 min, and then performed 20 min of mental arithmetic. Saliva samples (assayed for sAA and caffeine), blood pressure, and heart rate were taken before (baseline) and 15 min after the math stressor (stress). Results: Baseline sAA activity did not differ among the treatment groups; however, there was a statistically significant time by caffeine group interaction. Changes in sAA activity across the session were dependent on the amount of caffeine consumed. Following the challenge period, sAA activity among the placebo group was the lowest and sAA activity among the 400 mg treatment group was the highest. Separate repeated‐measures ANOVAs conducted for each drug treatment group revealed that sAA activity increased in response to stress and caffeine (i.e., 200 and 400 mg groups) but not to stress alone (i.e., placebo group). Conclusions: Findings provide evidence for acute sAA changes in response to caffeine and stress in habitual caffeine users. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hup.1126

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02397.x · DOI
  2. 10.1097/00006842-199807000-00021 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/S0091-3057(02)01011-0 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb18338.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bennett JM, 2006, Effects of caffeine and stress on cortisol and serial subtraction performance in young healthy men, Psychosom Med, 68, A‐77
  6. 10.1249/01.mss.0000187412.47477.ee · DOI
  7. 10.1016/0002-8703(82)90403-3 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1113/expphysiol.1996.sp003994 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2006.05.010 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/0265407506062479 · DOI
  11. James JE, 1997, Understanding Caffeine: A Biobehavioral Analysis
  12. 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1991.tb09239.x · DOI
  13. 10.1159/000119004 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1097/00006842-200207000-00009 · DOI
  15. 10.1210/jc.85.6.2170 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s00213-002-1217-9 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1988.tb00967.x · DOI
  18. 10.1097/00003246-200301000-00018 · DOI
  19. Mueller UK, 1997, Repeated versus daytime ambulatory blood pressure measurement in mild, moderate and severe untreated black hypertensive patients, Blood Press Monit, 2, 21
  20. 10.1016/0003-9969(92)90141-T · DOI
  21. 10.1177/014662167700100306 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2008.10.006 · DOI
  23. 10.2165/00139709-200625010-00004 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.12.004 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05878.x · DOI

Cited by

See all 46

Metadata

Authors
Klein, L. C., Bennett, J. M., Whetzel, C. A., Granger, D. A., & Ritter, F. E.
Venue
Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-06-29
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
359-367
ISSN
  • 0885-6222
  • 1099-1077
Cited by
46
References
11
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.