The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Conceptual Framework for E‐Learning in Developing Countries: A Critical Review of Research Challenges
Abstract
This paper presents a critical review of research on challenges for e‐learning with a particular focus on developing countries. A comprehensive literature review including 60 papers on e‐learning challenges was undertaken for the purpose of understanding how to implement e‐learning in developing countries. Research questions were: what has existing research identified as the major challenges for e‐learning, and, what differences, if any, are there between developing countries and developed countries in this respect? The literature study found 278 papers which were condensed to 60 based on exclusion and inclusion criteria designed to find papers of best quality as well as papers that clearly investigated well‐defined challenges. The research found 30 specific challenges which were grouped into four categories, viz.: courses, individuals, technology and context. The overall conclusion is that these challenges are equally valid for both developed and developing countries; however in developing countries more papers focus on access to technology and context whereas in developed countries more papers concern individuals. A further finding is that most papers focus on one or two categories of challenges; few papers exhibit a comprehensive view. Because challenges are interrelated, based on the findings we propose a conceptual framework of emerging issues for e‐learning in developed and developing countries. The framework is useful to guide both practice and research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Information Systems and Developing Countries: Failure, Success, and Local Improvisations
Heeks, R. (2002) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972240290075039 · Cited by 1,390 · cited 1×
“…plentiful; in many developing countries there is a lack of vital e-learning components such as computers, electricity and skills (Dhanarajan, 2001; Heeks, 2002; Rajesh, 2003); and the active, participative student that is required for interactive learning is also very rare in countries where the…”
The cultural relativity of the quality of life concept
Hofstede, G. (1984) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1984.4279653 · Cited by 1,257
Can e-learning replace classroom learning?
Zhang, D., Zhao, J. L., Zhou, L., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2004) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/986213.986216 · Cited by 1,062
Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses
Levy, Y. (2007) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.12.004 · Cited by 700
Successful implementation of e-Learning
Govindasamy, T. (2001) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/s1096-7516(01)00071-9 · Cited by 656
Khan, B. (1997) · Educational Technology Publications eBooks · Cited by 585
Key Factors for Determining Student Satisfaction in Online Courses
Bolliger, D. U. (2004) · International journal on e-learning · Cited by 536
Learner motivation and E-learning design: A multinationally validated process
Keller, J., & Suzuki, K. (2004) · Journal of Educational Media · doi:10.1080/1358165042000283084 · Cited by 523
Barriers to Learning in Distance Education
Galusha, J. M. (1997) · Cited by 396
Technology-Enhanced Learning in Developing Nations: A review
Gulati, S. (2008) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v9i1.477 · Cited by 353
Cited by
Baticulon, R. E., Sy, J. J., Alberto, N. R. I., Baron, M. B. C., Mabulay, R. E. C., Rizada, L. G. T., Tiu, C. J. S., Clarion, C. A., & Reyes, J. C. B. (2021) · Medical Science Educator · doi:10.1007/s40670-021-01231-z · Cited by 706
Understanding academics' adoption of learning technologies: A systematic review
Liu, Q., Geertshuis, S., & Grainger, R. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103857 · Cited by 279
Al-araibi, A. A. M., Mahrin, M. N. B., & Yusoff, R. C. M. (2019) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-018-9780-9 · Cited by 152
Bervell, B., & Arkorful, V. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-020-0183-9 · Cited by 144
“…the high demand of campus-based tertiary education, most institutions have leveraged on the distance education phenomenon where students are not required to be physically present at all times to study at a confined campus (Anderson & Dron, 2011; Andersson & Grönlund, 2009; Mohamedbhai, 2011).”
BackgroundAn e-learning approach to secondary education in Palestine: opportunities and challenges
Shraim, K., & Khlaif, Z. (2010) · Information Technology for Development · doi:10.1080/02681102.2010.501782 · Cited by 126
Metadata
- Authors
- Andersson, A., & Grönlund, Å.
- Venue
- THE ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-07
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-16
- ISSN
- 1681-4835 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2101291401
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 28.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Conceptual Framework for E‐Learning in Developing Countries: A Critical Review of Research Challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2009.tb00271.x
- The paper
- Andersson, A., & Grönlund, Å. (2009). A Conceptual Framework for E‐Learning in Developing Countries: A Critical Review of Research Challenges. THE ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2009.tb00271.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.