The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Leaving Engineering: A Multi‐Year Single Institution Study
Abstract
Background: As estimates continue to indicate a growing demand for engineering professionals, retention in engineering remains an issue. Thus, the engineering education community remains concerned about students who leave engineering and must work to identify the factors that influence those students’ decisions. Purpose (Hypothesis): Our purpose was to identify a set of factors describing the experiences of students’ in a college of engineering that are strong influences on decisions to leave and study how those factors are related to both predictor variables (e.g., high school preparation) and future behaviors (e.g., new major chosen). Design/Method: We solicited survey data from students who had recently transferred out of a large engineering college. We conducted exploratory factor analysis to determine the main factors for leaving engineering and then used these factors to answer the research questions. Results: Results indicate that both academic (e.g., curriculum difficulty and poor teaching and advising) and a non‐academic factor (lack of belonging in engineering) contribute to students’ decisions to leave engineering. We did find differences for some factors between majority and non‐majority students; however, there were no gender differences. Conclusions: Both academic and non‐academic factors contribute to students’ decisions to leave engineering; however, our sample indicated the non‐academic factors may be a stronger influence. Implications for educators focus on addressing both academic and the belonging factor and include examining pedagogical activities that may be less welcoming to a wide variety of student groups, providing opportunities for meaningful faculty interaction and other activities designed to support students pursuing engineering degrees.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797 · Cited by 9,020
Expectancies, values and academic behaviors
Eccles, J. S. (1983) · Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt) · Cited by 3,901
Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences
Correll, S. J., Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2655673 · Cited by 3,086
Science and Engineering Indicators
Washington, E., & Warren, M. E. (2004) · Cited by 2,822
Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2013: (558442013-001)
(2013) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e558442013-001 · Cited by 2,471
Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter?
Clark Blickenstaff*, J. (2005) · Gender and Education · doi:10.1080/09540250500145072 · Cited by 1,746
Science and Engineering Indicators
Bond, J. S., Humphrey, D. C., Paton, K. L., Hightower, A. M., Suter, L. E., Johnson, J. M., Pollak, M., Jankowski, J. E., Lehming, R., Rausch, L. M., et al. (1993) · Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · Cited by 1,631
Science and Engineering Indicators 1998
Wink, D. J. (1998) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/ed075p1078 · Cited by 1,327
Reworking the student departure puzzle
(2001) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-6319 · Cited by 1,192
Cited by
Godwin, A., Potvin, G., Hazari, Z., & Lock, R. (2016) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20118 · Cited by 574
Belonging and academic engagement among undergraduate STEM students: A multi-institutional study
Wilson, D., Jones, D., Bocell, F., Crawford, J., Kim, M. J., Veilleux, N., Floyd-Smith, T., Bates, R., & Plett, M. (2015) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-015-9367-x · Cited by 336
Meyer, M., & Marx, S. (2014) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20054 · Cited by 268
Self-efficacy and belonging: the impact of a university makerspace
Andrews, M. E., Borrego, M., & Boklage, A. (2021) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-021-00285-0 · Cited by 97
Taylor, C. L., Esmaili Zaghi, A., Kaufman, J. C., Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2020) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20310 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Engineering Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6-27
- ISSN
- 1069-4730 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-9830
- OpenAlex
- W2166598653
- Cited by
- 538
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 114.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Leaving Engineering: A Multi‐Year Single Institution Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00039.x
- The paper
- Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B. (2012). Leaving Engineering: A Multi‐Year Single Institution Study. Journal of Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00039.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.