Cited by 121Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

A confirmatory factor analysis of a self‐report version of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale

Oakman, Jonathan, Van Ameringen, Michael, Mancini, Catherine, Farvolden, Peter·2003·Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

One of the most popular measures of social phobia is the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS; Liebowitz, 1987). The LSAS is a 24‐item semi‐structured interview measure of fear and avoidance experienced in a range of social and performance situations. Recently, the LSAS has been modified to a self‐report version (LSAS‐SR) by several independent groups (Cox, Ross, Swinson, & Direnfeld, 1998; Fresco et al., 2001; Mancini, Van Ameringen, & Oakman, 1999). A self‐report version offers ease of administration, but it may differ from the structured interview version in its psychometric properties. We conducted confirmatory factor analyses of the self‐report version of the LSAS using data from a sample of 188 outpatients with anxiety disorders. The structure and psychometric properties of the LSAS‐SR are highly similar to that of the LSAS and robust across groups of patients with a variety of primary anxiety disorders. We argue in favor of adopting the 4‐factor model for the LSAS proposed by Safren et al. (1999) instead of the models implied by the scoring instructions for the LSAS. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol 59: 149–161, 2003.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jclp.10124

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oakman, J., Van Ameringen, M., Mancini, C., & Farvolden, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
Corresponding author
Oakman, Jonathan
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-12-30
Volume
59
Issue
1
Pages
149-161
ISSN
  • 0021-9762 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4679
OpenAlex
W2099188070
Cited by
121
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale, social anxiety disorder, factor structure, psychometric properties, anxiety disorders, scoring instructions, outpatients
MeSH terms
Adult, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Outpatients, Phobic Disorders, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review