Cited by 433Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Screening for social anxiety disorder with the self-report version of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale

Open access
Rytwinski, Nina K., Fresco, David M., Heimberg, Richard G., Coles, Meredith E., Liebowitz, Michael R., Cissell, Shadha, Stein, Murray B., Hofmann, Stefan G.·2009·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether the self-report version of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS-SR) could accurately identify individuals with social anxiety disorder and individuals with the generalized subtype of social anxiety disorder. Furthermore, the study sought to determine the optimal cutoffs for the LSAS-SR for identifying patients with social anxiety disorder and its generalized subtype. METHODS: Two hundred and ninety-one patients with clinician-assessed social anxiety disorder (240 with generalized social anxiety disorder) and 53 control participants who were free from current Axis-1 disorders completed the LSAS-SR. RESULTS: Receiver Operating Characteristic analyses revealed that the LSAS-SR performed well in identifying participants with social anxiety disorder and generalized social anxiety disorder. Consistent with Mennin et al.'s [2002: J Anxiety Disord 16:661-673] research on the clinician-administered version of the LSAS, cutoffs of 30 and 60 on the LSAS-SR provided the best balance of sensitivity and specificity for classifying participants with social anxiety and generalized social anxiety disorder, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The LSAS-SR may be an accurate and cost-effective way to identify and subtype patients with social anxiety disorder, which could help increase the percentage of people who receive appropriate treatment for this debilitating disorder.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.20503

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. DiNardo PA, Brown TA, Barlow DH. Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV: Lifetime Version (ADIS-IV- L). New York: Oxford University Press; 1994.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rytwinski, N. K., Fresco, D. M., Heimberg, R. G., Coles, M. E., Liebowitz, M. R., Cissell, S., Stein, M. B., & Hofmann, S. G.
Affiliations
  • Kent State University (US)
  • Temple University (US)
  • Binghamton University (US)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Fresco, David M.
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
34-38
ISSN
  • 1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6394
OpenAlex
W2120203492
Cited by
432
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 19
FWCI
10.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, generalized social anxiety disorder, Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale, self-report screening, diagnostic thresholds, sensitivity and specificity, screening accuracy, subtyping
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depressive Disorder, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Pennsylvania, Personality Inventory, Phobic Disorders, Psychometrics, Reference Values, Reproducibility of Results, Comorbidity, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review