Cited by 96Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentYouth Development and Social SupportSchool Choice and Performance

Using volunteer mentors to improve the academic outcomes of underserved students: the role of relationships

Bayer, Amanda, Grossman, Jean Baldwin, DuBois, David L.·2015·Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

Schools can benefit from understanding how to use community volunteers to achieve academic goals. A randomized control evaluation, involving 1,139 students from 71 schools, of the school‐based mentoring program of Big Brothers Big Sisters of America found modest but statistically significant improvements in the teacher‐rated academic performance and self‐reported scholastic efficacy of mentored students. The present study explores the causal mechanism behind these effects. We find that a close relationship between mentor and protégé appears key to better academic outcomes. Because relationship closeness is not randomly assigned, we use two‐stage least squares and other methods to control for potential selection bias. The role of emotional closeness as a mediator of program effects is evident across mentoring relationships of various lengths and statuses. Students were more likely to feel close to their mentors in programs that included weekly meetings and opportunities for mentor–protégé pairs to interact outside of a large‐group setting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcop.21693

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another factor contributing to program ineffectiveness was mentors' lack of knowledge and preparation.

    “Another factor contributing to the program's ineffectiveness was mentors' lack of knowledge and preparation for it, as highlighted by Bayer et al. (2015), Goulet et al. (2018), and Alwani et al. (2023).”

    From Outcome domains and assessment measures in school-based youth mentoring programs: a systematic review (2026) · cites this paper as Bayer et al. (2015)

    The Discussion (p. 20) says the mentors studied received no tutoring instruction or structured curriculum, and the analysis on p. 16 associates more mentor training with closer relationships. But the paper does not establish that lack of knowledge or preparation caused the citing paper’s program to be ineffective; it identifies relationship closeness as central to academic outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. DuBois, D. L., & Karcher, M. J. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of youth mentoring (2 nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  2. DuBois, D. L., & Neville, H. A. (1997). Youth mentoring: Investigation of relationship characteristics and perceived benefits. Journal of Community Psychology , 25, 227-234.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bayer, A., Grossman, J. B., & DuBois, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Swarthmore College (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Bayer, Amanda
Venue
Journal of Community Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
408-429
ISSN
  • 0090-4392 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6629
OpenAlex
W2115060703
Cited by
96
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6
FWCI
15.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Works - Scholarship, Research, & Creative Expression (Swarthmore College) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
school-based mentoring, volunteer mentors, Big Brothers Big Sisters, academic performance, mentor-protégé relationships, emotional closeness, underserved students, community volunteers, selection bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review