Cited by 100Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentYouth Development and Social SupportCareer Development and Diversity

Mentees’ Perceptions of Their Interpersonal Relationships: The Role of the Mentor—Youth Bond

Renick Thomson, Nicole, Zand, Debra H.·2010·Youth & Society

Abstract

Outcome studies of mentoring programs have demonstrated that they hold considerable promise in promoting competence across multiple developmental domains. A theoretical model of mentoring identified modification of youths’ perceptions of their interpersonal relationships as a contributor to positive outcomes. To date, however, there has not been a direct examination of the role of the mentor—youth bond in this process. The present study examines whether the quality of the mentoring relationship uniquely predicts other relationship-based outcomes at two time points. Regression analyses indicated that the quality of the mentor—youth bond significantly predicted youths’ scores in most relationship-based outcomes (i.e., friendship with and self-disclosure to adults) at 8 and 16 months. Study implications and directions for future research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0044118x09334806

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A critical limitation of some studies is that few included control groups or used reports from the same informant on the quality of the relationship or the level of functioning, thus possibly creating shared method variance.

    “Nevertheless, a critical limitation of some of these studies is that few included control groups or used reports from the same informant (usually the mentees) on the quality of the relationship or the level of functioning, thus possibly creating shared method variance (e.g., [52,53,54,61,64]).”
  • Findings from various American programs have indicated that mid-to late-elementary school-aged children and younger adolescents reported closer relationships with their mentors and tended to have more enduring matches than older adolescents.

    “Findings from various American programs have indicated that mid-to late-elementary school-aged children and younger adolescents reported closer relationships with their mentors and tended to have more enduring matches than those characterizing older adolescents [33,53,113].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Renick Thomson, N., & Zand, D. H.
Affiliations
  • Missouri Institute of Mental Health, St. Louis
  • Missouri Institute of Mental Health (US)
Venue
Youth & Society
Published
2009-05-08
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
434-445
ISSN
  • 0044-118X (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8499
OpenAlex
W2082899296
Cited by
99
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 11
FWCI
7.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Youth & Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
Keywords
mentoring programs, relationship quality, youth perspectives, friendship, interpersonal relationships, developmental outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review