Cited by 196Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentYouth Development and Social SupportCrime Patterns and Interventions

The Test of Time in School‐Based Mentoring: The Role of Relationship Duration and Re‐Matching on Academic Outcomes

Grossman, Jean B., Chan, Christian S., Schwartz, Sarah E. O., Rhodes, Jean E.·2012·American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

The influence of match length and re‐matching on the effectiveness of school‐based mentoring was studied in the context of a national, randomized study of 1,139 youth in Big Brothers Big Sisters programs. The sample included youth in grades four through nine from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds. At the end of the year, youth in intact relationships showed significant academic improvement, while youth in matches that terminated prematurely showed no impact. Those who were re‐matched after terminations showed negative impacts. Youth, mentor, and program characteristics associated with having an intact match were examined. Youth with high levels of baseline stress and those matched with college student mentors were likely to be in matches that terminated prematurely, while rejection‐sensitive youth and mentors who had previous mentoring experience were more likely to be in intact relationships. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10464-011-9435-0

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Student mentors who volunteer through high school and college programs tend to be less effective than older volunteer mentors.

    “student mentors who volunteer through high school and college programs tend to be less effective than older volunteer mentors (Herrera et al. 2008; Grossman et al. 2012).”

    From The Effects of Youth Mentoring Programs: A Meta-analysis of Outcome Studies (2019) · cites this paper as Grossman et al. 2012

  • Greater implementation of the benchmark practices defined in the EEPM has been linked with match longevity, a key predictor of stronger mentoring outcomes in previous studies.

    “In fact, greater implementation of the benchmark practices de fi ned in the EEPM has been linked with match longevity (Kupersmidt et al. 2017b), a key predictor of stronger mentoring outcomes in previous studies (Grossman et al. 2012).”

    From The Effects of Youth Mentoring Programs: A Meta-analysis of Outcome Studies (2019) · cites this paper as Grossman et al. 2012

  • Fulfilling length commitments is more important than the actual length of the relationship.

    “Additionally, as noted, ful fi lling length commitments is more important than the actual length of the relationship (Grossman et al. 2012).”

    From The Effects of Youth Mentoring Programs: A Meta-analysis of Outcome Studies (2019) · cites this paper as Grossman et al. 2012

  • The influence of mentoring relationships varies as a function of relationship quality, mentor, and mentee characteristics.

    “Of course, not all mentoring relationships are the same, and their influence can vary as a function of relationship quality, mentor, and mentee characteristics (Goldner & Mayseless, 2009; Grossman, Chan, Schwartz, & Rhodes, 2012; Grossman & Rhodes, 2002; Hurd & Sellers, 2013; Parra, DuBois, Neville, Pugh‐Lilly, & Povinelli, 2002; Rhodes et al., 2006).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grossman, J. B., Chan, C. S., Schwartz, S. E. O., & Rhodes, J. E.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
Corresponding author
Rhodes, Jean E.
Venue
American Journal of Community Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-04-06
Volume
49
Issue
1-2
Pages
43-54
ISSN
  • 0091-0562 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2770
OpenAlex
W2068047272
Cited by
196
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
FWCI
16.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
school-based mentoring, Big Brothers Big Sisters, match duration, breakup, educational outcomes, adolescent stress, rejection sensitivity, college student mentors, mentoring experience
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Mentors, Students, Time Factors, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review