Cited by 15Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentYouth Development and Social SupportAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

What mentees bring: Relationship characteristics pre-mentoring and mentoring relationship satisfaction

Williamson, Supriya, Lawrence, Edith, Lyons, Michael D., Deutsch, Nancy L.·2020·The Journal of Early Adolescence

Abstract

A critical mechanism through which mentors are thought to influence developmental outcomes is the mentee-mentor relationship. Attachment theories suggest that a mentee’s perceptions of other relationships in her life may impact the quality of the mentor-mentee relationship. This study tests this hypothesis. Data were drawn from a sample of 205 early adolescent girls who received a college-aged mentor through the Young Women Leaders Program for one academic year. In this exploratory study, we examine the association between mentees’ relationship characteristics (i.e., perceptions of, feelings about maternal and peer relationships) and mentoring relationship satisfaction. Results of multiple linear regressions revealed that less maternal quality communication and trust was associated with lower quality mentoring relationships (β = .258, p < .05). Higher levels of maternal alienation were associated with higher quality mentoring relationships (β = .241, p < .05). Results can inform mentor training to support strong mentoring relationships with girls experiencing a variety of attachment-related challenges with their mothers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0272431619891251

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Less maternal trust and quality communication predicted lower quality mentoring relationships among American adolescent female mentees in a short-term American program.

    “Preliminary findings demonstrated that less maternal trust and quality communication predicted lower quality mentoring relationships among American adolescent female mentees in a short-term American program [152].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williamson, S., Lawrence, E., Lyons, M. D., & Deutsch, N. L.
Affiliations
University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Williamson, Supriya
Venue
The Journal of Early Adolescence
Published
2019-12-05
Volume
40
Issue
7
Pages
996-1022
ISSN
  • 0272-4316 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5449
OpenAlex
W2993266602
Cited by
15
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Early Adolescence (publishedVersion)
Funders
Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools (Q184B070479)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
mentoring relationships, relationship satisfaction, attachment theory, maternal communication, maternal trust, early adolescent girls, mentor training, peer relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review